» Articles » PMID: 38583107

Trends in Oral Anticoagulant Use and Individual Expenditures Across the United States from 2014 to 2020

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Landmark clinical trials have expended the indications for the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), but contemporary data on usage and expenditure patterns are lacking.

Objective: This study aimed to assess annual trends in oral anticoagulant (OAC) utilization and expenditure across the United States (US) from 2014 to 2020.

Methods: We utilized the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) to study the trends of use and expenditures of warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban between 2014 and 2020 in the US. Survey respondents reported OAC use within the past year, which was verified against pharmacy records. Payment information was obtained from the respondent's pharmacy and was categorized as third-party or self/out-of-pocket. Potential indications and medical conditions of interest for OAC therapy were identified from respondent-reported medical conditions. We estimated the national number of OAC users and total expenditures across age, sex, race, ethnicity, insurance, and medical condition subgroups. Trends of OAC users' characteristics, expenditure, and number of prescriptions were evaluated using the Mann-Kendall test for trends.

Results: Between 2014 and 2020, the number of warfarin users decreased from 3.8 million (70% of all OAC users) to 2.2 million (p = 0.007) [29% of all OAC users], while the number of DOAC users increased from 1.6 million (30% of all OAC users) to 5.4 million (p = 0.003) [70% of all OAC users]. The total expenditure of OACs in the US increased from $3.4 billion in 2014 to $17.8 billion in 2020 (p = 0.003), which was driven by the increase in DOAC expenditures (p = 0.003).

Conclusions: DOACs have replaced warfarin as the preferred OAC in the US. The increased costs associated with DOAC use may decline when generic formulations are approved.

Citing Articles

Prune extract prevents disuse osteoporosis by inhibiting the decrease in osteoblast-related gene expression in sciatic-denervated rats.

Hanzawa F, Kiriyama K, Nakashima A, Iwami A, Yamamoto H J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2025; 76(1):42-49.

PMID: 39896165 PMC: 11782775. DOI: 10.3164/jcbn.24-139.


Application of a Novel UPLC-MS/MS Method for Analysis of Rivaroxaban Concentrations in Dried Blood Spot and Plasma Samples Collected from Patients with Venous Thrombosis.

Pawlak K, Kruszyna L, Miecznikowska M, Karazniewicz-Lada M Molecules. 2024; 29(17).

PMID: 39274988 PMC: 11397208. DOI: 10.3390/molecules29174140.

References
1.
Rodwin B, Salami J, Spatz E, Valero-Elizondo J, Virani S, Blankstein R . Variation in the Use of Warfarin and Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation and Associated Cost Implications. Am J Med. 2018; 132(1):61-70.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.09.026. View

2.
Diener H, Sacco R, Easton J, Granger C, Bernstein R, Uchiyama S . Dabigatran for Prevention of Stroke after Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source. N Engl J Med. 2019; 380(20):1906-1917. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1813959. View

3.
Calkins H, Willems S, Gerstenfeld E, Verma A, Schilling R, Hohnloser S . Uninterrupted Dabigatran versus Warfarin for Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2017; 376(17):1627-1636. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1701005. View

4.
Gibson C, Mehran R, Bode C, Halperin J, Verheugt F, Wildgoose P . Prevention of Bleeding in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing PCI. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375(25):2423-2434. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611594. View

5.
Devereaux P, Duceppe E, Guyatt G, Tandon V, Rodseth R, Biccard B . Dabigatran in patients with myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MANAGE): an international, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2018; 391(10137):2325-2334. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30832-8. View