» Articles » PMID: 38578889

Combining Blood-Based Biomarkers and Structural MRI Measurements to Distinguish Persons with and Without Significant Amyloid Plaques

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialties Geriatrics
Neurology
Date 2024 Apr 5
PMID 38578889
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques play a pivotal role in Alzheimer's disease. The current positron emission tomography (PET) is expensive and limited in availability. In contrast, blood-based biomarkers (BBBMs) show potential for characterizing Aβ plaques more affordably. We have previously proposed an MRI-based hippocampal morphometry measure to be an indicator of Aβ plaques.

Objective: To develop and validate an integrated model to predict brain amyloid PET positivity combining MRI feature and plasma Aβ42/40 ratio.

Methods: We extracted hippocampal multivariate morphometry statistics from MR images and together with plasma Aβ42/40 trained a random forest classifier to perform a binary classification of participant brain amyloid PET positivity. We evaluated the model performance using two distinct cohorts, one from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) and the other from the Banner Alzheimer's Institute (BAI), including prediction accuracy, precision, recall rate, F1 score, and AUC score.

Results: Results from ADNI (mean age 72.6, Aβ+ rate 49.5%) and BAI (mean age 66.2, Aβ+ rate 36.9%) datasets revealed the integrated multimodal (IMM) model's superior performance over unimodal models. The IMM model achieved prediction accuracies of 0.86 in ADNI and 0.92 in BAI, surpassing unimodal models based solely on structural MRI (0.81 and 0.87) or plasma Aβ42/40 (0.73 and 0.81) predictors.

Conclusions: Our IMM model, combining MRI and BBBM data, offers a highly accurate approach to predict brain amyloid PET positivity. This innovative multiplex biomarker strategy presents an accessible and cost-effective avenue for advancing Alzheimer's disease diagnostics, leveraging diverse pathologic features related to Aβ plaques and structural MRI.

References
1.
Pizer S, Fritsch D, Yushkevich P, Johnson V, Chaney E . Segmentation, registration, and measurement of shape variation via image object shape. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2000; 18(10):851-65. DOI: 10.1109/42.811263. View

2.
Su Y, Flores S, Wang G, Hornbeck R, Speidel B, Joseph-Mathurin N . Comparison of Pittsburgh compound B and florbetapir in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2019; 11:180-190. PMC: 6389727. DOI: 10.1016/j.dadm.2018.12.008. View

3.
Liss J, Seleri Assuncao S, Cummings J, Atri A, Geldmacher D, Candela S . Practical recommendations for timely, accurate diagnosis of symptomatic Alzheimer's disease (MCI and dementia) in primary care: a review and synthesis. J Intern Med. 2021; 290(2):310-334. PMC: 8359937. DOI: 10.1111/joim.13244. View

4.
Klunk W, Koeppe R, Price J, Benzinger T, Devous Sr M, Jagust W . The Centiloid Project: standardizing quantitative amyloid plaque estimation by PET. Alzheimers Dement. 2014; 11(1):1-15.e1-4. PMC: 4300247. DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.07.003. View

5.
Reiman E . Drug trial for Alzheimer's disease is a game changer. Nature. 2023; 615(7950):42-43. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-023-00393-7. View