"It is Very Hard to Just Accept This" - a Qualitative Study of Palliative Care Teams' Ethical Reasoning when Patients Do Not Want Information

Overview

Journal BMC Palliat Care

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Critical Care

Date 2024 Apr 4

PMID 38575905

Authors

Joar Bjork

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to explore how palliative care staff reason about the autonomy challenge that arises when a patient who has first said he wants full information appears to change his mind and rejects being informed.

Methods: The study had a qualitative and exploratory design. Participants (physicians, registred nurses, social workers, physiotherapists and occupational therapists) were recruited from palliative care teams in southern Sweden. Six separate focus group interviews with a total number of 33 participants were conducted. The teams were asked to discuss a fictional case of a man who first wants, then rejects, information about his situation. The interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Reflexive thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke was undertaken to analyse data.

Results: The analysis resulted in three themes: Patients have a right to reject information, Questioning whether this patient WANTS to reject information and There are other values at stake, too. Although participants endorsed a right to reject information, they were unsure whether this right was relevant in this situation, and furthermore felt that it should be balanced against counteracting factors. The effect of such balancing was that participants would aim to find a way to present relevant information to the patient, but in a probing and flexible way.

Conclusions: In their work with dying patients, palliative care staff meet many autonomy challenges. When faced with a choice to withhold information as per a patient's wishes, or to provide information with the patient's best interest in mind, staff find it hard to balance competing values. Staff also find it hard to balance their own interests against a purely professional stance. The overall strategy seems to be to look for caring ways to impart the information.

References

Bekkema N, de Veer A, Hertogh C, Francke A . Respecting autonomy in the end-of-life care of people with intellectual disabilities: a qualitative multiple-case study. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013; 58(4):368-80. DOI: 10.1111/jir.12023. View

Halpern J . From idealized clinical empathy to empathic communication in medical care. Med Health Care Philos. 2013; 17(2):301-11. DOI: 10.1007/s11019-013-9510-4. View

Zimmermann C . Acceptance of dying: a discourse analysis of palliative care literature. Soc Sci Med. 2012; 75(1):217-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.047. View

Kjelsvik M, Sekse R, Moi A, Aasen E, Gjengedal E . Walking on a tightrope-Caring for ambivalent women considering abortions in the first trimester. J Clin Nurs. 2018; 27(21-22):4192-4202. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14612. View

Hilding U, Allvin R, Blomberg K . Striving for a balance between leading and following the patient and family - nurses' strategies to facilitate the transition from life-prolonging care to palliative care: an interview study. BMC Palliat Care. 2018; 17(1):55. PMC: 5883396. DOI: 10.1186/s12904-018-0311-7. View

Braun V, Clarke V . Is thematic analysis used well in health psychology? A critical review of published research, with recommendations for quality practice and reporting. Health Psychol Rev. 2023; 17(4):695-718. DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2022.2161594. View

Houska A, Loucka M . Patients' Autonomy at the End of Life: A Critical Review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019; 57(4):835-845. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.12.339. View

Zalonis R, Slota M . The use of palliative care to promote autonomy in decision making. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2014; 18(6):707-11. DOI: 10.1188/14.CJON.707-711. View

Janssens R, Zylicz Z, ten Have H . Articulating the concept of palliative care: philosophical and theological perspectives. J Palliat Care. 1999; 15(2):38-44. View

10.

Hawthorne D, Yurkovich N . Human relationship: the forgotten dynamic in palliative care. Palliat Support Care. 2006; 1(3):261-5. DOI: 10.1017/s147895150303027x. View

11.

Woods S . Respect for persons, autonomy and palliative care. Med Health Care Philos. 2005; 8(2):243-53. DOI: 10.1007/s11019-005-2506-y. View

12.

Owen G, Szmukler G, Richardson G, David A, Raymont V, Freyenhagen F . Decision-making capacity for treatment in psychiatric and medical in-patients: cross-sectional, comparative study. Br J Psychiatry. 2013; 203(6):461-7. PMC: 3844898. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.123976. View

13.

Dive L, Newson A . Reconceptualizing Autonomy for Bioethics. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2018; 28(2):171-203. DOI: 10.1353/ken.2018.0013. View

14.

Kurkowski S, Heckel M, Pfaller L, Peters J, Bazata J, Schildmann E . Possible age-related differences in healthcare professionals' perspectives on younger and older patients' autonomy and decision-making in the context of sedation in specialised palliative care: exploratory secondary qualitative content and.... BMC Palliat Care. 2022; 21(1):71. PMC: 9101857. DOI: 10.1186/s12904-022-00963-y. View

15.

Fan R . Self-determination vs. family-determination: two incommensurable principles of autonomy: a report from East Asia. Bioethics. 1997; 11(3-4):309-22. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8519.00070. View

16.

Ellemers N, van der Toorn J, Paunov Y, van Leeuwen T . The Psychology of Morality: A Review and Analysis of Empirical Studies Published From 1940 Through 2017. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2019; 23(4):332-366. PMC: 6791030. DOI: 10.1177/1088868318811759. View

17.

Baik D, Cho H, Masterson Creber R . Examining Interventions Designed to Support Shared Decision Making and Subsequent Patient Outcomes in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018; 36(1):76-88. PMC: 6056336. DOI: 10.1177/1049909118783688. View

18.

Rosenberg L, Brenner K, Jackson V, Jacobsen J, Shalev D, Byrne-Martelli S . The Meaning of Together: Exploring Transference and Countertransference in Palliative Care Settings. J Palliat Med. 2021; 24(11):1598-1602. DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0240. View

19.

Schelin M, Sallerfors B, Rasmussen B, Furst C . Quality of care for the dying across different levels of palliative care development: A population-based cohort study. Palliat Med. 2018; 32(10):1596-1604. PMC: 6238183. DOI: 10.1177/0269216318801251. View

20.

Rees M . Patient autonomy and withholding information. Bioethics. 2023; 37(3):256-264. DOI: 10.1111/bioe.13130. View