Soil Pore Characteristics and the Fate of New Switchgrass-derived Carbon in Switchgrass and Prairie Bioenergy Cropping Systems

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Specialty Science

Date 2024 Apr 3

PMID 38570696

Authors

Kyungmin Kim

Archana Juyal

Alexandra Kravchenko

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Monoculture switchgrass and restored prairie are promising perennial feedstock sources for bioenergy production on the lands unsuitable for conventional agriculture. Such lands often display contrasting topography that influences soil characteristics and interactions between plant growth and soil C gains. This study aimed at elucidating the influences of topography and plant systems on the fate of C originated from switchgrass plants and on its relationships with soil pore characteristics. For that, switchgrass plants were grown in intact soil cores collected from two contrasting topographies, namely steep slopes and topographical depressions, in the fields in multi-year monoculture switchgrass and restored prairie vegetation. The C pulse labeling allowed tracing the C of switchgrass origin, which X-ray computed micro-tomography enabled in-detail characterization of soil pore structure. In eroded slopes, the differences between the monoculture switchgrass and prairie in terms of total and microbial biomass C were greater than those in topographical depressions. While new switchgrass increased the CO emission in depressions, it did not significantly affect the CO emission in slopes. Pores of 18-90 µm Ø facilitated the accumulation of new C in soil, while > 150 µm Ø pores enhanced the mineralization of the new C. These findings suggest that polyculture prairie located in slopes can be particularly beneficial in facilitating soil C accrual and reduce C losses as CO.

References

Yang Y, Tilman D, Furey G, Lehman C . Soil carbon sequestration accelerated by restoration of grassland biodiversity. Nat Commun. 2019; 10(1):718. PMC: 6372642. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-08636-w. View

King A, Blesh J . Crop rotations for increased soil carbon: perenniality as a guiding principle. Ecol Appl. 2017; 28(1):249-261. DOI: 10.1002/eap.1648. View

Juyal A, Guber A, Oerther M, Quigley M, Kravchenko A . Pore architecture and particulate organic matter in soils under monoculture switchgrass and restored prairie in contrasting topography. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):21998. PMC: 8578609. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-01533-7. View

Agostini F, Gregory A, Richter G . Carbon Sequestration by Perennial Energy Crops: Is the Jury Still Out?. Bioenergy Res. 2016; 8:1057-1080. PMC: 4732603. DOI: 10.1007/s12155-014-9571-0. View

Robertson G, Hamilton S, Barham B, Dale B, Izaurralde R, Jackson R . Cellulosic biofuel contributions to a sustainable energy future: Choices and outcomes. Science. 2017; 356(6345). DOI: 10.1126/science.aal2324. View

Cotrufo M, Wallenstein M, Boot C, Denef K, Paul E . The Microbial Efficiency-Matrix Stabilization (MEMS) framework integrates plant litter decomposition with soil organic matter stabilization: do labile plant inputs form stable soil organic matter?. Glob Chang Biol. 2013; 19(4):988-95. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12113. View

Tecon R, Or D . Biophysical processes supporting the diversity of microbial life in soil. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2017; 41(5):599-623. PMC: 5812502. DOI: 10.1093/femsre/fux039. View

Kravchenko A, Guber A, Razavi B, Koestel J, Quigley M, Robertson G . Microbial spatial footprint as a driver of soil carbon stabilization. Nat Commun. 2019; 10(1):3121. PMC: 6635512. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-11057-4. View

White R, Kirkegaard J . The distribution and abundance of wheat roots in a dense, structured subsoil--implications for water uptake. Plant Cell Environ. 2009; 33(2):133-48. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02059.x. View

10.

Bhattacharyya R, Rabbi S, Zhang Y, Young I, Jones A, Dennis P . Soil organic carbon is significantly associated with the pore geometry, microbial diversity and enzyme activity of the macro-aggregates under different land uses. Sci Total Environ. 2021; 778:146286. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146286. View

11.

Gelfand I, Sahajpal R, Zhang X, Izaurralde R, Gross K, Robertson G . Sustainable bioenergy production from marginal lands in the US Midwest. Nature. 2013; 493(7433):514-7. DOI: 10.1038/nature11811. View

12.

Kaleita A, Schott L, Hargreaves S, Hofmockel K . Differences in soil biological activity by terrain types at the sub-field scale in central Iowa US. PLoS One. 2017; 12(7):e0180596. PMC: 5501568. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180596. View

13.

Xu X, Schimel J, Thornton P, Song X, Yuan F, Goswami S . Substrate and environmental controls on microbial assimilation of soil organic carbon: a framework for Earth system models. Ecol Lett. 2014; 17(5):547-55. DOI: 10.1111/ele.12254. View

14.

Lange M, Eisenhauer N, Sierra C, Bessler H, Engels C, Griffiths R . Plant diversity increases soil microbial activity and soil carbon storage. Nat Commun. 2015; 6:6707. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7707. View

15.

Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T . Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012; 9(7):676-82. PMC: 3855844. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. View

16.

Lucas M, Santiago J, Chen J, Guber A, Kravchenko A . The soil pore structure encountered by roots affects plant-derived carbon inputs and fate. New Phytol. 2023; 240(2):515-528. DOI: 10.1111/nph.19159. View

17.

Jensen J, Schjonning P, Watts C, Christensen B, Munkholm L . Short-term changes in soil pore size distribution: Impact of land use. Soil Tillage Res. 2020; 199:104597. PMC: 7074003. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2020.104597. View

18.

Tilman D, Hill J, Lehman C . Carbon-negative biofuels from low-input high-diversity grassland biomass. Science. 2006; 314(5805):1598-600. DOI: 10.1126/science.1133306. View