» Articles » PMID: 38568216

Evidence for Cemented TKA and THA Based on A comparison of International Register Data

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2024 Apr 3
PMID 38568216
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Hip and knee implants can either be fixed without cement, press-fit, or with bone cement. Real-world data from arthroplasty registers, as well as studies provide a broad database for the discussion of cemented versus uncemented arthroplasty procedures.

Objective: What does current evidence from international arthroplasty registries and meta-analyses recommend regarding cemented or cementless fixation of hip and knee implants?

Methods: A recommendation is generated by means of direct data comparison from the arthroplasty registries of eight countries (USA, Germany, Australia, UK, Sweden, Norway, New Zealand, Netherlands), the comparison of 22 review studies and meta-analyses based on registry data, as well as an evaluation of recommendations of healthcare systems from different nations. For this purpose, reviews and meta-analyses were selected where the results were statistically significant, as were the annual reports of the arthroplasty registries that were current at the time of writing.

Results: For knee arthroplasties, long survival time as well as lower risk of revision can be achieved with the support of cemented fixation with antibiotic-loaded bone cement. In patients aged 70 years and older, cemented fixation of hip stem implants significantly reduces risk of intraoperative or postoperative periprosthetic fracture (quadruple). This applies both to elective total hip arthroplasties and to hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fractures. Antibiotic-loaded bone cement significantly (p = 0.041) reduces the risk of periprosthetic infection, especially in patients with femoral neck fractures.

Conclusion: Total knee replacement with antibiotic-loaded bone cement is well established internationally and is evidence-based. Registry data and meta-analyses recommend cemented fixation of the hip stem in older patients. In Germany, USA and Australia these evidence-based recommendations still must be transferred to daily practice.

References
1.
Mohammed J, Mukka S, Hedbeck C, Chammout G, Gordon M, Skoldenberg O . Reduced periprosthetic fracture rate when changing from a tapered polished stem to an anatomical stem for cemented hip arthroplasty: an observational prospective cohort study with a follow-up of 2 years. Acta Orthop. 2019; 90(5):427-432. PMC: 6746294. DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1624339. View

2.
Jameson S, Asaad A, Diament M, Kasim A, Bigirumurame T, Baker P . Antibiotic-loaded bone cement is associated with a lower risk of revision following primary cemented total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of 731,214 cases using National Joint Registry data. Bone Joint J. 2019; 101-B(11):1331-1347. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B11.BJJ-2019-0196.R1. View

3.
Ramsay N, Close J, Harris I, Harvey L . The impact of cement fixation on early mortality in arthroplasty for hip fracture. Bone Jt Open. 2023; 4(3):198-204. PMC: 10032234. DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.43.BJO-2023-0006.R1. View

4.
Broden C, Mukka S, Muren O, Eisler T, Boden H, Stark A . High risk of early periprosthetic fractures after primary hip arthroplasty in elderly patients using a cemented, tapered, polished stem. Acta Orthop. 2014; 86(2):169-74. PMC: 4404766. DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2014.971388. View

5.
Evans J, Walker R, Evans J, Blom A, Sayers A, Whitehouse M . How long does a knee replacement last? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and national registry reports with more than 15 years of follow-up. Lancet. 2019; 393(10172):655-663. PMC: 6381229. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32531-5. View