» Articles » PMID: 38567102

Short Versus Long-acting Erythropoiesis-stimulating Agents for Anemia Management in Egyptian Hemodialysis Patients

Overview
Journal Qatar Med J
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Apr 3
PMID 38567102
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) often results in renal anemia, impacting the well-being of patients and causing various negative consequences. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) offer promising solutions for managing anemia in CKD. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness, safety profile, and cost-effectiveness of short-acting (Eprex) and long-acting (Aranesp) ESAs.

Method: This comparative prospective cohort cost-effectiveness study was carried out over 6 months among adult Egyptian hemodialysis patients of either gender. Participants were categorized into two groups based on the type of ESA administered: the Eprex group, receiving epoetin alfa, and the Aranesp group, receiving darbepoetin alfa. These two treatment groups' efficacy, safety, and cost were analyzed and compared.

Results: Of 127 hemodialysis patients, 60 (47.2%) received Eprex, while 67 (52.8%) were treated with Aranesp. Target hemoglobin (Hb) was achieved by 50.6% of patients in the Eprex group versus 63.4% in the Aranesp group, with a significant difference ( < 0.001). Both treatment groups exhibited a similar safety profile, while Aranesp was considered the cost-saving protocol.

Conclusion: In hemodialysis Egyptian patients, Aranesp with extended dosing intervals proved to be more effective in achieving target Hb with comparable adverse effect profiles, a substantial cost-saving strategy, and offered time-saving advantages for medical staff workload compared to Eprex.

Trial Registration: The Clinicaltrial.gov registration ID is NCT05699109 (26/01/2023).

References
1.
Stephens J, Emerson L, Spry L, Caloyeras J, Anderson E, Reitan J . Time savings of weekly versus three-times-per-week administration of erythropoiesis stimulating agents in United States dialysis patients. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015; 32(2):313-20. DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1123144. View

2.
Kovesdy C . Epidemiology of chronic kidney disease: an update 2022. Kidney Int Suppl (2011). 2022; 12(1):7-11. PMC: 9073222. DOI: 10.1016/j.kisu.2021.11.003. View

3.
Chen N, Xing C, Niu J, Liu B, Fu J, Zhao J . Darbepoetin alfa injection versus epoetin alfa injection for treating anemia of Chinese hemodialysis patients with chronic kidney failure: A randomized, open-label, parallel-group, non-inferiority Phase III trail. Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2022; 8(1):59-70. PMC: 9128564. DOI: 10.1002/cdt3.13. View

4.
Lawesson S, Swahn E, Alfredsson J . Adherence to Study Drugs: A Matter of Sex?. Circulation. 2021; 143(7):696-698. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.053493. View

5.
Moreno F, Lopez Gomez J, Sanz-Guajardo D, Jofre R, Valderrabano F . Quality of life in dialysis patients. A spanish multicentre study. Spanish Cooperative Renal Patients Quality of Life Study Group. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1996; 11 Suppl 2:125-9. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/11.supp2.125. View