» Articles » PMID: 38566745

Underlay Myringoplasty Versus Overlay Myringoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2024 Apr 3
PMID 38566745
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-023-04425-6.

References
1.
Aggarwal R, Saeed S, Green K . Myringoplasty. J Laryngol Otol. 2006; 120(6):429-32. DOI: 10.1017/S0022215106000697. View

2.
Plodpai Y, Paje N . The outcomes of overlay myringoplasty: Endoscopic versus microscopic approach. Am J Otolaryngol. 2017; 38(5):542-546. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2017.05.007. View

3.
Albazee E, Abdelaziz A, Magzoub H, Alanzi A, Aldosari N, Al-Qudah M . Dry versus wet temporalis fascia graft in type-I tympanoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022; 280(3):1005-1015. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07725-9. View

4.
Singh M, Rai A, Bandyopadhyay S, Gupta S . Comparative study of the underlay and overlay techniques of myringoplasty in large and subtotal perforations of the tympanic membrane. J Laryngol Otol. 2003; 117(6):444-8. DOI: 10.1258/002221503321892262. View

5.
Bayram A, Bayar Muluk N, Cingi C, Bafaqeeh S . Success rates for various graft materials in tympanoplasty - A review. J Otol. 2020; 15(3):107-111. PMC: 7451680. DOI: 10.1016/j.joto.2020.01.001. View