» Articles » PMID: 38565600

Comparing Efficacy of Charged-particle Therapy with Brachytherapy in Treatment of Uveal Melanoma

Overview
Journal Eye (Lond)
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2024 Apr 2
PMID 38565600
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary ocular tumour in adults. The most used eye-preserving treatments are charged-particle therapy (CPT) and brachytherapy. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare efficacies and complications of these two radiotherapies.

Methods: We searched EMBASE, PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library from January 2012 to December 2022. Two independent reviewers identified controlled studies comparing outcomes of CPT versus brachytherapy. Case series that utilize either treatment modality were also reviewed.

Results: One hundred fifty studies met the eligibility criteria, including 2 randomized control trials, 5 controlled cohort studies, and 143 case series studies. We found significant reduction in local recurrence rate among patients treated with CPT compared to brachytherapy (Odds ratio[OR] 0.38, 95% Confidence interval [CI] 0.24-0.60, p < 0.01). Analysis also showed a trend of increased risks of secondary glaucoma after CPT. No statistically significant differences were found in analyzing risks of mortality, enucleation, and cataract.

Conclusions: Our study suggested no difference in mortality, enucleation rate and cataract formation rate comparing the two treatments. Lower local recurrence rate and possibly higher secondary glaucoma incidence was noted among patients treated with CPT. Nevertheless, the overall level of evidence is limited, and further high-quality studies are necessary to provide a more definitive conclusion.

References
1.
Barker C, Francis J, Cohen G, Marr B, Wolden S, McCormick B . (106)Ru plaque brachytherapy for uveal melanoma: factors associated with local tumor recurrence. Brachytherapy. 2014; 13(6):584-90. PMC: 4664055. DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2014.04.002. View

2.
Isager P, Ehlers N, Urbak S, Overgaard J . Visual outcome, local tumour control, and eye preservation after 106Ru/Rh brachytherapy for choroidal melanoma. Acta Oncol. 2006; 45(3):285-93. DOI: 10.1080/02841860500468950. View

3.
Diener-West M, Earle J, Fine S, Hawkins B, Moy C, Reynolds S . The COMS randomized trial of iodine 125 brachytherapy for choroidal melanoma, II: characteristics of patients enrolled and not enrolled. COMS Report No. 17. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001; 119(7):951-65. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.119.7.951. View

4.
Hauzinger J, Blatsios G, Haas G, Zehetner C, Velez-Escola L, Nowosielski Y . Proton beam radiation for iris melanoma: case series and review of literature. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2022; 6(1):e000683. PMC: 8705205. DOI: 10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000683. View

5.
Char D, Kroll S, Phillips T, Quivey J . Late radiation failures after iodine 125 brachytherapy for uveal melanoma compared with charged-particle (proton or helium ion) therapy. Ophthalmology. 2002; 109(10):1850-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01174-0. View