» Articles » PMID: 38565152

Body Mass Mediates Spatio-temporal Responses of Mammals to Human Frequentation Across Italian Protected Areas

Abstract

Protected area (PA) networks are a pivotal tool to fight biodiversity loss, yet they often need to balance the mission of nature conservation with the socio-economic need of giving opportunity for outdoor recreation. Recreation in natural areas is important for human health in an urbanized society, but can prompt behavioural modifications in wild animals. Rarely, however, have these responses being studied across multiple PAs and using standardized methods. We deployed a systematic camera trapping protocol at over 200 sites to sample medium and large mammals in four PAs within the European Natura 2000 network to assess their spatio-temporal responses to human frequentation, proximity to towns, amount of open habitat and topographical variables. By applying multi-species and single-species models for the number of diurnal, crepuscular and nocturnal detections and a multi-species model for nocturnality index, we estimated both species-specific- and meta-community-level effects, finding that increased nocturnality appeared the main strategy that the mammal meta-community used to cope with human disturbance. However, responses in the diurnal, crepuscular and nocturnal site use were mediated by species' body mass, with larger species exhibiting avoidance of humans and smaller species more opportunistic behaviours. Our results show the effectiveness of standardized sampling and provide insights for planning the expansion of PA networks as foreseen by the Kunming-Montreal biodiversity agreement.

References
1.
Cusack J, Dickman A, Rowcliffe J, Carbone C, Macdonald D, Coulson T . Random versus Game Trail-Based Camera Trap Placement Strategy for Monitoring Terrestrial Mammal Communities. PLoS One. 2015; 10(5):e0126373. PMC: 4423779. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126373. View

2.
Wilcove D, Wikelski M . Going, going, gone: is animal migration disappearing. PLoS Biol. 2008; 6(7):e188. PMC: 2486312. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060188. View

3.
Wilson M, Ridlon A, Gaynor K, Gaines S, Stier A, Halpern B . Ecological impacts of human-induced animal behaviour change. Ecol Lett. 2020; 23(10):1522-1536. DOI: 10.1111/ele.13571. View

4.
Bonnot N, Couriot O, Berger A, Cagnacci F, Ciuti S, De Groeve J . Fear of the dark? Contrasting impacts of humans versus lynx on diel activity of roe deer across Europe. J Anim Ecol. 2019; 89(1):132-145. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.13161. View

5.
Gaynor K, Hojnowski C, Carter N, Brashares J . The influence of human disturbance on wildlife nocturnality. Science. 2018; 360(6394):1232-1235. DOI: 10.1126/science.aar7121. View