» Articles » PMID: 38564101

Ceftaroline Fosamil for the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia: A Real-World Comparative Clinical Outcomes Study

Overview
Date 2024 Apr 2
PMID 38564101
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objective: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia results in substantial morbidity and mortality. As current treatments often lead to unsatisfactory outcomes, evidence guiding alternative treatment options is needed. This study evaluated real-world clinical outcomes of ceftaroline fosamil for the treatment of MRSA bacteremia.

Methods: This retrospective study included adults hospitalized with MRSA bacteremia between 2011 and 2019. Patients were classified according to treatment with ceftaroline fosamil (ceftaroline), vancomycin, or daptomycin: Group 1, ceftaroline; Group 2, vancomycin or daptomycin (without ceftaroline); Group 3, combination therapy with ≥ 2 of these three agents. Clinical outcomes were compared using propensity-score-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) from logistic regression models.

Results: Overall, 24,479 patients were included (Group 1, n = 532; Group 2, n = 21,555; Group 3, n = 2392). Mean age was 59.6, 60.8, and 57.4 years in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Mean post-index treatment length of stay was 8.8, 8.8, and 8.0 days, respectively. The most frequent line of therapy was ceftaroline first-line (42.1%), vancomycin or daptomycin first-line (95.4%), and combination therapy third-line or later (67.8%) in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Compared with Group 2, Groups 1 and 3 had similar favorable clinical responses {odds ratio [OR] = 1.18 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98-1.44], p = 0.08; OR = 1.20 [95% CI 0.97-1.47], p = 0.09, respectively} and were less likely to switch treatment (both p < 0.001). Compared with Group 2, Group 1 was more likely to undergo 30-day all-cause readmission [OR = 1.38 (95% CI 1.06-1.80), p = 0.02], whereas this was less likely for Group 3 [OR = 0.77 (95% CI 0.58-1.00), p = 0.05].

Conclusions: Patients receiving ceftaroline more often had favorable clinical responses than those receiving vancomycin or daptomycin monotherapy. In the absence of large-scale randomized controlled trials, these real-world data provide insights into the potential role of ceftaroline for treating MRSA bacteremia.

References
1.
Schweizer M, Furuno J, Harris A, Johnson J, Shardell M, McGregor J . Comparative effectiveness of nafcillin or cefazolin versus vancomycin in methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. BMC Infect Dis. 2011; 11:279. PMC: 3206863. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-11-279. View

2.
Zasowski E, Trinh T, Claeys K, Casapao A, Sabagha N, Lagnf A . Multicenter Observational Study of Ceftaroline Fosamil for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016; 61(2). PMC: 5278749. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02015-16. View

3.
Lounsbury N, Reeber M, Mina G, Chbib C . A Mini-Review on Ceftaroline in Bacteremia Patients with Methicillin-Resistant (MRSA) Infections. Antibiotics (Basel). 2019; 8(1). PMC: 6466573. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics8010030. View

4.
Geriak M, Haddad F, Rizvi K, Rose W, Kullar R, LaPlante K . Clinical Data on Daptomycin plus Ceftaroline versus Standard of Care Monotherapy in the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019; 63(5). PMC: 6496065. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02483-18. View

5.
White B, Barber K, Stover K . Ceftaroline for the treatment of methicillin-resistant bacteremia. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2017; 74(4):201-208. DOI: 10.2146/ajhp160006. View