» Articles » PMID: 38563004

Effects of Three Weeks Base Training at Moderate Simulated Altitude with or Without Hypoxic Residence on Exercise Capacity and Physiological Adaptations in Well-trained Male Runners

Overview
Journal PeerJ
Date 2024 Apr 2
PMID 38563004
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To test the hypothesis that 'live high-base train high-interval train low' (HiHiLo) altitude training, compared to 'live low-train high' (LoHi), yields greater benefits on performance and physiological adaptations.

Methods: Sixteen young male middle-distance runners (age, 17.0 ± 1.5 y; body mass, 58.8 ± 4.9 kg; body height, 176.3 ± 4.3 cm; training years, 3-5 y; training distance per week, 30-60 km.wk) with a peak oxygen uptake averaging ~65 ml.min.kg trained in a normobaric hypoxia chamber (simulated altitude of ~2,500 m, monitored by heart rate ~170 bpm; thrice weekly) for 3 weeks. During this period, the HiHiLo group ( = 8) stayed in normobaric hypoxia (at ~2,800 m; 10 h.day), while the LoHi group ( = 8) resided near sea level. Before and immediately after the intervention, peak oxygen uptake and exercise-induced arterial hypoxemia responses (incremental cycle test) as well as running performance and time-domain heart rate variability (5-km time trial) were assessed. Hematological variables were monitored at baseline and on days 1, 7, 14 and 21 during the intervention.

Results: Peak oxygen uptake and running performance did not differ before and after the intervention in either group (all > 0.05). Exercise-induced arterial hypoxemia responses, measured both at submaximal (240 W) and maximal loads during the incremental test, and log-transformed root mean square of successive R-R intervals during the 4-min post-run recovery period, did not change (all > 0.05). Hematocrit, mean reticulocyte absolute count and reticulocyte percentage increased above baseline levels on day 21 of the intervention (all < 0.001), irrespective of group.

Conclusions: Well-trained runners undertaking base training at moderate simulated altitude for 3 weeks, with or without hypoxic residence, showed no performance improvement, also with unchanged time-domain heart rate variability and exercise-induced arterial hypoxemia responses.

Citing Articles

[Body Function Changes and Prevention Strategies in High-Altitude Environment].

Lei Y, Chen L, Ma W, Wang R, Li W Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2025; 55(6):1446-1453.

PMID: 39990826 PMC: 11839358. DOI: 10.12182/20241160104.

References
1.
Durand F, Raberin A . Exercise-Induced Hypoxemia in Endurance Athletes: Consequences for Altitude Exposure. Front Sports Act Living. 2021; 3:663674. PMC: 8107360. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2021.663674. View

2.
Bernardi L, Passino C, Serebrovskaya Z, Serebrovskaya T, Appenzeller O . Respiratory and cardiovascular adaptations to progressive hypoxia; effect of interval hypoxic training. Eur Heart J. 2001; 22(10):879-86. DOI: 10.1053/euhj.2000.2466. View

3.
Wille M, Mairer K, Gatterer H, Philippe M, Faulhaber M, Burtscher M . Changes in cardiac autonomic activity during a passive 8 hour acute exposure to 5 500 m normobaric hypoxia are not related to the development of acute mountain sickness. Int J Sports Med. 2012; 33(3):186-91. DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1291325. View

4.
Garvican-Lewis L, Sharpe K, Gore C . Time for a new metric for hypoxic dose?. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2016; 121(1):352-5. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00579.2015. View

5.
Saugy J, Schmitt L, Cejuela R, Faiss R, Hauser A, Wehrlin J . Comparison of "Live High-Train Low" in normobaric versus hypobaric hypoxia. PLoS One. 2014; 9(12):e114418. PMC: 4269399. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114418. View