» Articles » PMID: 38561019

Loss of the DNA Repair Gene RNase H2 Identifies a Unique Subset of DDR-Deficient Leiomyosarcomas

Abstract

Targeting the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway is an emerging therapeutic approach for leiomyosarcoma (LMS), and loss of RNase H2, a DDR pathway member, is a potentially actionable alteration for DDR-targeted treatments. Therefore, we designed a protein- and genomic-based RNase H2 screening assay to determine its prevalence and prognostic significance. Using a selective RNase H2 antibody on a pan-tumor microarray (TMA), RNase H2 loss was more common in LMS (11.5%, 9/78) than across all tumors (3.8%, 32/843). In a separate LMS cohort, RNase H2 deficiency was confirmed in uterine LMS (U-LMS, 21%, 23/108) and soft-tissue LMS (ST-LMS; 30%, 39/102). In the TCGA database, RNASEH2B homozygous deletions (HomDels) were found in 6% (5/80) of LMS cases, with a higher proportion in U-LMS (15%; 4/27) compared with ST-LMS (2%; 1/53). Using the SNiPDx targeted-NGS sequencing assay to detect biallelic loss of function in select DDR-related genes, we found RNASEH2B HomDels in 54% (19/35) of U-LMS cases with RNase H2 loss by IHC, and 7% (3/43) HomDels in RNase H2 intact cases. No RNASEH2B HomDels were detected in ST-LMS. In U-LMS patient cohort (n = 109), no significant overall survival difference was seen in patients with RNase H2 loss versus intact, or RNASEH2B HomDel (n = 12) versus Non-HomDel (n = 37). The overall diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of RNase H2 IHC for detecting RNA-SEH2B HomDels in U-LMS was 76%, 93%, and 71%, respectively, and it is being developed for future predictive biomarker driven clinical trials targeting DDR in U-LMS.

Citing Articles

Papillary Thyroid Cancer Remodels the Genetic Information Processing Pathways.

Iacobas D, Iacobas S Genes (Basel). 2024; 15(5).

PMID: 38790250 PMC: 11120757. DOI: 10.3390/genes15050621.

References
1.
Sutton G, Blessing J, MALFETANO J . Ifosfamide and doxorubicin in the treatment of advanced leiomyosarcomas of the uterus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 1996; 62(2):226-9. DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1996.0220. View

2.
Hensley M, Sill M, Scribner Jr D, Brown J, DeBernardo R, Hartenbach E . Sunitinib malate in the treatment of recurrent or persistent uterine leiomyosarcoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group phase II study. Gynecol Oncol. 2009; 115(3):460-5. PMC: 2783261. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.09.011. View

3.
Wang C, Wang G, Feng X, Shepherd P, Zhang J, Tang M . Genome-wide CRISPR screens reveal synthetic lethality of RNASEH2 deficiency and ATR inhibition. Oncogene. 2018; 38(14):2451-2463. PMC: 6450769. DOI: 10.1038/s41388-018-0606-4. View

4.
Kapp D, Shin J, Chan J . Prognostic factors and survival in 1396 patients with uterine leiomyosarcomas: emphasis on impact of lymphadenectomy and oophorectomy. Cancer. 2008; 112(4):820-30. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23245. View

5.
. Comprehensive and Integrated Genomic Characterization of Adult Soft Tissue Sarcomas. Cell. 2017; 171(4):950-965.e28. PMC: 5693358. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.014. View