» Articles » PMID: 38560273

Effects of Different Nitrogen Fertilization Systems on Crop Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency - Results of a Field Experiment in Southern Germany

Overview
Journal Heliyon
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2024 Apr 1
PMID 38560273
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The effects of the German Fertilizer Application Ordinance (GFO) on crop yield, nitrogen use efficiency and economical performance are highly controversial in science and practice in Germany. This study presents the results of a multi-year field experiment conducted at an experimental farm in southern Germany, in which the effects of different fertilizer systems on crop yield, protein concentration and nitrogen balance were analyzed. At this study site, relatively low N mineralization from the soil N pool was detected. Wheat ( L.) and barley ( L.) showed strong yield declines from annual to multi-annual unfertilized plots, for maize ( L.), this yield decrease was not observed. The recommendations according to GFO meets the fertilizer requirement at the trial site well. A 20% reduction of fertilization compared to GFO resulted in a 5% yield reduction and a decrease in protein concentration of wheat and barley. According to the quadratic N response function, the GFO treatment was slightly below the economic optimum nitrogen rate (N) for wheat, and close to N for winter barley on average over the trial years. For maize, a relatively high yield variability has been observed in the trial period so far. Sensor-based fertilization resulted in very high yields with high N use efficiency (up to 85%). This fertilization system can help to reduce nitrogen input and minimize nitrogen surplus. For wheat and barley, N fertilization and N uptake were well balanced, for maize clearly negative N surpluses were calculated. Despite all the discussion and criticism of GFO, the results of the plot trial show that high yields with high N use efficiency can be achieved with fertilization according to GFO.

Citing Articles

Effects of Sensor-Based, Site-Specific Nitrogen Fertilizer Application on Crop Yield, Nitrogen Balance, and Nitrogen Efficiency.

Hagn L, Mittermayer M, Kern A, Kimmelmann S, Maidl F, Hulsbergen K Sensors (Basel). 2025; 25(3).

PMID: 39943436 PMC: 11820920. DOI: 10.3390/s25030795.

References
1.
Gu B, Zhang X, Lam S, Yu Y, van Grinsven H, Zhang S . Cost-effective mitigation of nitrogen pollution from global croplands. Nature. 2023; 613(7942):77-84. PMC: 9842502. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-05481-8. View

2.
Zhang C, Ju X, Powlson D, Oenema O, Smith P . Nitrogen Surplus Benchmarks for Controlling N Pollution in the Main Cropping Systems of China. Environ Sci Technol. 2019; 53(12):6678-6687. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b06383. View

3.
Kalaji H, Oukarroum A, Alexandrov V, Kouzmanova M, Brestic M, Zivcak M . Identification of nutrient deficiency in maize and tomato plants by in vivo chlorophyll a fluorescence measurements. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2014; 81:16-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.03.029. View

4.
Puntel L, Sawyer J, Barker D, Dietzel R, Poffenbarger H, Castellano M . Modeling Long-Term Corn Yield Response to Nitrogen Rate and Crop Rotation. Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7:1630. PMC: 5104953. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01630. View

5.
van Grinsven H, Holland M, Jacobsen B, Klimont Z, Sutton M, Willems W . Costs and benefits of nitrogen for Europe and implications for mitigation. Environ Sci Technol. 2013; 47(8):3571-9. DOI: 10.1021/es303804g. View