» Articles » PMID: 38560097

Sequential Model Based on Human Cognitive Processing to Robot Acceptance

Overview
Journal Front Robot AI
Date 2024 Apr 1
PMID 38560097
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Robots have tremendous potential, and have recently been introduced not only for simple operations in factories, but also in workplaces where customer service communication is required. However, communication robots have not always been accepted. This study proposes a three-stage (first contact, interaction, and decision) model for robot acceptance based on the human cognitive process flow to design preferred robots and clarifies the elements of the robot and the processes that affect robot acceptance decision-making. Unlike previous robot acceptance models, the current model focuses on a sequential account of how people decide to accept, considering the interaction (or carry-over) effect between impressions established at each stage. According to the model, this study conducted a scenario-based experiment focusing on the impression of the first contact (a robot's appearance) and that formed during the interaction with robot (politeness of its conversation and behavior) on robot acceptance in both successful and slightly failed situations. The better the appearance of the robot and the more polite its behavior, the greater the acceptance rate. Importantly, there was no interaction between these two factors. The results indicating that the impressions of the first contact and interaction are additively processed suggest that we should accumulate findings that improving the appearance of the robot and making its communication behavior more human-like in politeness will lead to a more acceptable robot design.

Citing Articles

Impact of politeness and performance quality of android robots on future interaction decisions: a conversational design perspective.

Saeki W, Ueda Y Front Robot AI. 2024; 11:1393456.

PMID: 38863781 PMC: 11165153. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1393456.

References
1.
Prakash A, Rogers W . Why Some Humanoid Faces Are Perceived More Positively Than Others: Effects of Human-Likeness and Task. Int J Soc Robot. 2015; 7(2):309-331. PMC: 4539254. DOI: 10.1007/s12369-014-0269-4. View

2.
Saeki W, Ueda Y . Impact of politeness and performance quality of android robots on future interaction decisions: a conversational design perspective. Front Robot AI. 2024; 11:1393456. PMC: 11165153. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1393456. View

3.
Furlough C, Stokes T, Gillan D . Attributing Blame to Robots: I. The Influence of Robot Autonomy. Hum Factors. 2019; 63(4):592-602. DOI: 10.1177/0018720819880641. View

4.
Gawronski B, Armstrong J, Conway P, Friesdorf R, Hutter M . Consequences, norms, and generalized inaction in moral dilemmas: The CNI model of moral decision-making. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017; 113(3):343-376. DOI: 10.1037/pspa0000086. View

5.
Mizuno J, Saito D, Sadohara K, Nihei M, Ohnaka S, Suzurikawa J . Effect of the Information Support Robot on the Daily Activity of Older People Living Alone in Actual Living Environment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(5). PMC: 7967636. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18052498. View