» Articles » PMID: 38559667

Parsimonious Waveform-derived Features Consisting of Pulse Arrival Time and Heart Rate Variability Predicts the Onset of Septic Shock

Abstract

Sepsis is a major public health emergency and one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. For each hour treatment is delayed, shock-related mortality increases, so early diagnosis and intervention is of utmost importance. However, earlier recognition of shock requires active monitoring, which may be delayed due to subclinical manifestations of the disease at the early phase of onset. Machine learning systems can increase timely detection of shock onset by exploiting complex interactions among continuous physiological waveforms. We use a dataset consisting of high-resolution physiological waveforms from intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary hospital system. We investigate the use of mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), pulse arrival time (PAT), heart rate variability (HRV), and heart rate (HR) for the early prediction of shock onset. Using only five minutes of the aforementioned vital signals from 239 ICU patients, our developed models can accurately predict septic shock onset 6 to 36 hours prior to clinical recognition with area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 0.84 and 0.8 respectively. This work lays foundations for a robust, efficient, accurate and early prediction of septic shock onset which may help clinicians in their decision-making processes. This study introduces machine learning models that provide fast and accurate predictions of septic shock onset times up to 36 hours in advance. BP, PAT and HR dynamics can independently predict septic shock onset with a look-back period of only 5 mins.

References
1.
Yoon J, Jeanselme V, Dubrawski A, Hravnak M, Pinsky M, Clermont G . Prediction of hypotension events with physiologic vital sign signatures in the intensive care unit. Crit Care. 2020; 24(1):661. PMC: 7687996. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-03379-3. View

2.
Singer M, Deutschman C, Seymour C, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M . The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016; 315(8):801-10. PMC: 4968574. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. View

3.
Kamaleswaran R, Sataphaty S, Mas V, Eason J, Maluf D . Artificial Intelligence May Predict Early Sepsis After Liver Transplantation. Front Physiol. 2021; 12:692667. PMC: 8450439. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.692667. View

4.
Shapiro N, Wolfe R, Moore R, Smith E, Burdick E, Bates D . Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) score: a prospectively derived and validated clinical prediction rule. Crit Care Med. 2003; 31(3):670-5. DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000054867.01688.D1. View

5.
Mollura M, Romano S, Mantoan G, Lehman L, Barbieri R . Prediction of Septic Shock Onset in ICU by Instantaneous Monitoring of Vital Signs. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2020; 2020:2768-2771. DOI: 10.1109/EMBC44109.2020.9176276. View