Understanding the Utility of Endocardial Electrocardiographic Imaging in Epi-Endocardial Mapping of 3D Reentrant Circuits

Overview

Journal medRxiv

Date 2024 Apr 1

PMID 38559058

Authors

Maryam Toloubidokhti

Omar A Gharbia

Adityo Parkosa

Natalia Trayanova

Alexios Hadjis

Roderick Tung

Saman Nazarian

John L Sapp

Linwei Wang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Studies of VT mechanisms are largely based on a 2D portrait of reentrant circuits on one surface of the heart. This oversimplifies the 3D circuit that involves the depth of the myocardium. Simultaneous epicardial and endocardial (epi-endo) mapping was shown to facilitate a 3D delineation of VT circuits, which is however difficult via invasive mapping.

Objective: This study investigates the capability of noninvasive epicardial-endocardial electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) to elucidate the 3D construct of VT circuits, emphasizing the differentiation of epicardial, endocardial, and intramural circuits and to determine the proximity of mid-wall exits to the epicardial or endocardial surfaces.

Methods: 120-lead ECGs of VT in combination with subject-specific heart-torso geometry are used to compute unipolar electrograms (CEGM) on ventricular epicardium and endocardia. Activation isochrones are constructed, and the percentage of activation within VT cycle length is calculated on each surface. This classifies VT circuits into 2D (surface only), uniform transmural, nonuniform transmural, and mid-myocardial (focal on surfaces). Furthermore, the endocardial breakthrough time was accurately measured using Laplacian eigenmaps, and by correlating the delay time of the epi-endo breakthroughs, the relative distance of a mid-wall exit to the epicardium or the endocardium surfaces was identified.

Results: We analyzed 23 simulated and in-vivo VT circuits on post-infarction porcine hearts. In simulated circuits, ECGI classified 21% as 2D and 78% as 3D: 82.6% of these were correctly classified. The relative timing between epicardial and endocardial breakthroughs was correctly captured across all cases. In in-vivo circuits, ECGI classified 25% as 2D and 75% as 3D: in all cases, circuit exits and entrances were consistent with potential critical isthmus delineated from combined LGE-MRI and catheter mapping data.

Conclusions: ECGI epi-endo mapping has the potential for fast delineation of 3D VT circuits, which may augment detailed catheter mapping for VT ablation.

References

Wissner E, Stevenson W, Kuck K . Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy: where are we today? A clinical review. Eur Heart J. 2012; 33(12):1440-50. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs007. View

Tsyganov A, Wissner E, Metzner A, Mironovich S, Chaykovskaya M, Kalinin V . Mapping of ventricular arrhythmias using a novel noninvasive epicardial and endocardial electrophysiology system. J Electrocardiol. 2017; 51(1):92-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2017.07.018. View

Pashakhanloo F, Herzka D, Mori S, Zviman M, Halperin H, Gai N . Submillimeter diffusion tensor imaging and late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance of chronic myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017; 19(1):9. PMC: 5264305. DOI: 10.1186/s12968-016-0317-3. View

Van Dam P, Tung R, Shivkumar K, Laks M . Quantitative localization of premature ventricular contractions using myocardial activation ECGI from the standard 12-lead electrocardiogram. J Electrocardiol. 2013; 46(6):574-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2013.08.005. View

Pashakhanloo F, Herzka D, Halperin H, McVeigh E, Trayanova N . Role of 3-Dimensional Architecture of Scar and Surviving Tissue in Ventricular Tachycardia: Insights From High-Resolution Ex Vivo Porcine Models. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018; 11(6):e006131. PMC: 5994925. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.006131. View

Sapp J, Dawoud F, Clements J, Horacek B . Inverse solution mapping of epicardial potentials: quantitative comparison with epicardial contact mapping. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012; 5(5):1001-9. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.970160. View

Wang L, Gharbia O, Nazarian S, Horacek B, Sapp J . Non-invasive epicardial and endocardial electrocardiographic imaging for scar-related ventricular tachycardia. Europace. 2018; 20(FI2):f263-f272. PMC: 6140441. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euy082. View

Cuculich P, Schill M, Kashani R, Mutic S, Lang A, Cooper D . Noninvasive Cardiac Radiation for Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377(24):2325-2336. PMC: 5764179. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613773. View

Wang Y, Cuculich P, Zhang J, Desouza K, Vijayakumar R, Chen J . Noninvasive electroanatomic mapping of human ventricular arrhythmias with electrocardiographic imaging. Sci Transl Med. 2011; 3(98):98ra84. PMC: 3182467. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002152. View

10.

Stevenson W . Current treatment of ventricular arrhythmias: state of the art. Heart Rhythm. 2013; 10(12):1919-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.10.019. View

11.

Burton B, Tate J, Erem B, Swenson D, Wang D, Steffen M . A toolkit for forward/inverse problems in electrocardiography within the SCIRun problem solving environment. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012; 2011:267-70. PMC: 3337752. DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6090052. View

12.

Wang L, Zhang H, Wong K, Liu H, Shi P . Physiological-model-constrained noninvasive reconstruction of volumetric myocardial transmembrane potentials. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2009; 57(2):296-315. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2009.2024531. View

13.

Haissaguerre M, Hocini M, Shah A, Derval N, Sacher F, Jais P . Noninvasive panoramic mapping of human atrial fibrillation mechanisms: a feasibility report. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013; 24(6):711-7. DOI: 10.1111/jce.12075. View

14.

Hubley-Kozey C, Mitchell L, Gardner M, WARREN J, Penney C, Smith E . Spatial features in body-surface potential maps can identify patients with a history of sustained ventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 1995; 92(7):1825-38. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.92.7.1825. View

15.

Burnes J, Taccardi B, Rudy Y . A noninvasive imaging modality for cardiac arrhythmias. Circulation. 2000; 102(17):2152-8. PMC: 2034298. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.102.17.2152. View

16.

Vijayakumar R, Vasireddi S, Cuculich P, Faddis M, Rudy Y . Methodology Considerations in Phase Mapping of Human Cardiac Arrhythmias. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016; 9(11). PMC: 5137810. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004409. View

17.

Graham A, Orini M, Zacur E, Dhillon G, Daw H, Srinivasan N . Evaluation of ECG Imaging to Map Hemodynamically Stable and Unstable Ventricular Arrhythmias. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020; 13(2):e007377. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007377. View

18.

de Chillou C, Lacroix D, Klug D, Magnin-Poull I, Marquie C, Messier M . Isthmus characteristics of reentrant ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2002; 105(6):726-31. DOI: 10.1161/hc0602.103675. View

19.

Tung R, Raiman M, Liao H, Zhan X, Chung F, Nagel R . Simultaneous Endocardial and Epicardial Delineation of 3D Reentrant Ventricular Tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; 75(8):884-897. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.12.044. View

20.

Robinson C, Samson P, Moore K, Hugo G, Knutson N, Mutic S . Phase I/II Trial of Electrophysiology-Guided Noninvasive Cardiac Radioablation for Ventricular Tachycardia. Circulation. 2018; 139(3):313-321. PMC: 6331281. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038261. View