» Articles » PMID: 38558761

Clinical Trial Protocol for "Replace Cysto": Replacing Invasive Cystoscopy with Urine Testing for Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Surveillance-A Multicenter, Randomized, Phase 2 Healthcare Delivery Trial Comparing Quality of Life During Cancer...

Overview
Date 2024 Apr 1
PMID 38558761
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

"Replace Cysto" is a multisite randomized phase 2 trial including 240 participants with low-grade intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, in which participants will be randomized 1:1:1 to one of two urine marker-based approaches alternating a urine marker test (Xpert Bladder Cancer Monitor or Bladder EpiCheck) with cystoscopy or to frequent scheduled cystoscopy. The primary objective is to determine whether urinary quality of life after surveillance is significantly improved in the urine marker arms. The primary outcome will be the patient-reported urinary quality of life domain score of the validated QLQ-NMIBC24 instrument, measured 1-3 d after surveillance. Exploratory outcomes include discomfort after surveillance, the number of invasive procedures that participants undergo per 1000 person years, complications from these procedures per 1000 person years, nonurinary quality of life, acceptability of surveillance, and bladder cancer recurrence and progression. Comparators include surveillance using (1) the Xpert Bladder Cancer Monitor test, (2) the Bladder EpiCheck urinary marker, or (3) frequent cystoscopy alone. After a negative cystoscopy ≤4 mo following bladder tumor resection, all the participants will undergo surveillance at 6, 12, 18, and 24 mo (with time zero defined as the date of the most recent bladder tumor resection). In the urine marker arms, surveillance at 6 and 18 mo will be performed with the marker. Regardless of the arm, participants will undergo cystoscopy at 12 and 24 mo. End of study for each participant will be their 24-mo cystoscopy. Overall trial duration is estimated at 5 yr from when the study opens to enrollment until completion of data analyses. The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05796375).

Citing Articles

North American study and meta-analysis evaluating performance of Bladder EpiCheck, a FDA cleared test, in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer recurrence.

Fleshner N, Grossman H, Berglund R, Hafron J, Inman B, Karsh L Bladder Cancer. 2025; 10(4):278-289.

PMID: 40035078 PMC: 11864238. DOI: 10.1177/23523735241304348.


Predictive value of Bladder EpiCheck in detecting residual tumor before second TUR for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Suzan S, Ulus I, Hacibey I, Muslumanoglu A World J Urol. 2025; 43(1):89.

PMID: 39869192 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-025-05453-3.


Investigation on clinical risk factors of bladder lesion by machine learning based interpretable model.

Wang Y, Li J, Song Y, Wei H, Yan Z, Chen S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):24299.

PMID: 39414893 PMC: 11484899. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-75104-x.


The Simultaneous Use of Bladder Epicheck and Urinary Cytology Can Improve the Sensitivity and Specificity of Diagnostic Follow-Up of Urothelial Lesions: Up-to-Date Data from a Multi-Institutional Cohort.

Pepe L, Fiorentino V, Pizzimenti C, Riganati G, Franchina M, Micali M Diseases. 2024; 12(9).

PMID: 39329888 PMC: 11431392. DOI: 10.3390/diseases12090219.


Reply to Chao Song's Letter to the Editor re: Florus C. de Jong, Iris G. Iflé, Angelique C. van der Made, et al. A Genomic Urine Assay for Surveillance of Patients with Bladder Cancer Treated with Radiotherapy. Eur Urol Open Sci 2024;62:131-9.

de Jong F, Zuiverloon T, Boormans J Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024; 66:9.

PMID: 39006471 PMC: 11245909. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.06.003.


References
1.
van der Aa M, Steyerberg E, Bangma C, van Rhijn B, Zwarthoff E, van der Kwast T . Cystoscopy revisited as the gold standard for detecting bladder cancer recurrence: diagnostic review bias in the randomized, prospective CEFUB trial. J Urol. 2009; 183(1):76-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.150. View

2.
Lotan Y, Roehrborn C . Sensitivity and specificity of commonly available bladder tumor markers versus cytology: results of a comprehensive literature review and meta-analyses. Urology. 2003; 61(1):109-18; discussion 118. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02136-2. View

3.
Kukreja J, Schroeck F, Lotan Y, Gore J, Ullman R, Lipman R . Discomfort and relieving factors among patients with bladder cancer undergoing office-based cystoscopy. Urol Oncol. 2021; 40(1):9.e19-9.e27. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.05.009. View

4.
Hollingsworth J, Zhang Y, Miller D, Skolarus T, Wood D, Lee C . Identifying better practices for early-stage bladder cancer. Med Care. 2011; 49(12):1112-7. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182353baf. View

5.
Weiner B, Lewis C, Stanick C, Powell B, Dorsey C, Clary A . Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implement Sci. 2017; 12(1):108. PMC: 5576104. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3. View