» Articles » PMID: 38558094

Quantifying the Relationship Between Unilateral Induced Metamorphopsia and Stereopsis Impairment

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2024 Apr 1
PMID 38558094
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the relationship between unilateral metamorphopsia, characterized by visual distortions in one eye, and impaired stereopsis.

Methods: Utilizing both near and distance measurements through advanced testing systems, including 4K smartphones and an active shutter three-dimensional system, we simulated varying degrees of unilateral metamorphopsia in 30 healthy young adults aged between 21 and 29 years. Two types of contour-based stereotest symbols, lines and squares, were developed. Distortions were classified into six distinct patterns, each further divided into eight grades of severity. Participants were tasked with identifying visual targets, and their stereothresholds were determined under different conditions of induced distortion. Stereopsis was measured within a range of 2.9 to 1.0 log arcsec, at 0.2 log arcsec intervals. Stereopsis changes under different distortion scenarios were analyzed using the generalized estimating equations, with a sequential Bonferroni adjustment applied for pairwise comparisons.

Results: A direct and quantifiable correlation was observed between the severity of metamorphopsia and reductions in stereopsis. As the degree of visual distortion increased, notably in both frequency and amplitude, there was a corresponding decline in stereopsis. This relationship held true in both near and distance measurements of stereopsis. Statistical analyses further reinforced these findings, highlighting a significant detrimental effect of distortion components on stereoacuity.

Conclusions: The findings highlight the clinical significance of understanding the interplay between unilateral metamorphopsia and stereopsis. Early interventions in conditions leading to metamorphopsia might be critical to maintaining optimal stereopsis.

References
1.
Takabatake M, Higashide T, Udagawa S, Sugiyama K . POSTOPERATIVE CHANGES AND PROGNOSTIC FACTORS OF VISUAL ACUITY, METAMORPHOPSIA, AND ANISEIKONIA AFTER VITRECTOMY FOR EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE. Retina. 2017; 38(11):2118-2127. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001831. View

2.
Cho S, Park S, Byun S, Woo S, Park K . Five-year nationwide incidence of macular hole requiring surgery in Korea. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019; 103(11):1619-1623. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313237. View

3.
Midena E, Vujosevic S . Metamorphopsia: An Overlooked Visual Symptom. Ophthalmic Res. 2015; 55(1):26-36. DOI: 10.1159/000441033. View

4.
Ugarte M, Shunmugam M, H Laidlaw D, Williamson T . Morphision: a method for subjective evaluation of metamorphopsia in patients with unilateral macular pathology (i.e., full thickness macular hole and epiretinal membrane). Indian J Ophthalmol. 2013; 61(11):653-8. PMC: 3959082. DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.117804. View

5.
Arimura E, Matsumoto C, Nomoto H, Hashimoto S, Takada S, Okuyama S . Correlations between M-CHARTS and PHP findings and subjective perception of metamorphopsia in patients with macular diseases. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010; 52(1):128-35. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-3535. View