» Articles » PMID: 38554161

The Radiomics Nomogram Predicts the Prognosis of Pancreatic Cancer Patients with Hepatic Metastasis After Chemoimmunotherapy

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To construct a prognostic model based on MR features and clinical data to evaluate the progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) of pancreatic cancer patients with hepatic metastases who received chemoimmunotherapy.

Methods: 105 pancreatic cancer patients with hepatic metastases who received chemoimmunotherapy were assigned to the training set (n = 52), validation set (n = 22), and testing set (n = 31). Multi-lesion volume of interest were delineated, multi-sequence radiomics features were extracted, and the radiomics models for predicting PFS, OS and ORR were constructed, respectively. Clinical variables were extracted, and the clinical models for predicting PFS, OS and ORR were constructed, respectively. The nomogram was jointly constructed by radiomics model and clinical model.

Result: The ORR exhibits no significant correlation with either PFS or OS. The area under the curve (AUC) of nomogram for predicting 6-month PFS reached 0.847 (0.737-0.957), 0.786 (0.566-1.000) and 0.864 (0.735-0.994) in the training set, validation set and testing set, respectively. The AUC of nomogram for predicting 1-year OS reached 0.770 (0.635-0.906), 0.743 (0.479-1.000) and 0.818 (0.630-1.000), respectively. The AUC of nomogram for predicting ORR reached 0.914 (0.828-1.00), 0.938 (0.840-1.00) and 0.846 (0.689-1.00), respectively.

Conclusion: The prognostic models based on MR imaging features and clinical data are effective in predicting the PFS, OS and ORR of chemoimmunotherapy in pancreatic cancer patients with hepatic metastasis, and can be used to evaluate the prognosis of patients.

Citing Articles

CREB3L1 facilitates pancreatic tumor progression and reprograms intratumoral tumor-associated macrophages to shape an immunotherapy-resistance microenvironment.

Xu H, Xue S, Sun Y, Ma J, Li S, Wang Y J Immunother Cancer. 2025; 13(1.

PMID: 39762079 PMC: 11749327. DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2024-010029.


Predicting and Monitoring Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy Using Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Cancer.

Yu G, Zhang Z, Eresen A, Hou Q, Amirrad F, Webster S Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(22).

PMID: 39596108 PMC: 11593706. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252212038.

References
1.
Siegel R, Miller K, Wagle N, Jemal A . Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023; 73(1):17-48. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21763. View

2.
He C, Huang X, Zhang Y, Lin X, Li S . The impact of different metastatic patterns on survival in patients with pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology. 2021; 21(3):556-563. DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2021.01.014. View

3.
Du Y, Bai X, Yang W, Zhang Z, Wang S, Wu W . Percutaneous ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for patients with liver metastasis from pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Int J Hyperthermia. 2022; 39(1):517-524. DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2022.2048907. View

4.
Liu L, Huang X, Shi F, Song J, Guo C, Yang J . Combination therapy for pancreatic cancer: anti-PD-(L)1-based strategy. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2022; 41(1):56. PMC: 8827285. DOI: 10.1186/s13046-022-02273-w. View

5.
Chen S, Wang S, Chen Y . The Immunotherapy for Colorectal Cancer, Lung Cancer and Pancreatic Cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(23). PMC: 8657810. DOI: 10.3390/ijms222312836. View