» Articles » PMID: 38553722

Patients' Evaluation of Aftercare Following Hospitalization for COVID-19: Satisfaction and Unmet Needs

Abstract

Background: Patient experiences with COVID-19 aftercare remain largely unknown. We evaluated COVID-19 aftercare from a patient perspective one year after hospitalization, assessing satisfaction and its associated factors, and unmet needs.

Methods: The Satisfaction with COVID-19 Aftercare Questionnaire (SCAQ) was developed as part of a multicenter prospective cohort study and administered one year after hospital discharge. The SCAQ assesses (1) patient satisfaction, comprising information provision, rehabilitation, follow-up by hospitals and general practitioners (GPs), the most important aftercare topics, and overall satisfaction, and (2) unmet needs.

Results: 487/561 (87%) COVID-19 patients completed the SCAQ, all had been discharged from the hospital between March 2020 and May 2021. Among responders, the median age of patients was 60 (IQR 54-67) years, 338 (69%) were male, and the median length of stay in the hospital was 13 (6-27) days. Patients were least satisfied with information on who could be contacted with questions when health problems arise (59% satisfied or very satisfied). Many patients (75%) received rehabilitation, most frequently community-based (70%). Across the different community-based therapies, ≥ 60% of patients were satisfied with shared-decision making and ≥ 70% with the received therapy; a majority (≥ 79%) indicated a preference for receiving the same therapy again if needed. Regarding follow-up by hospitals, 86% of patients received this follow-up, most frequently visiting a pulmonologist (96%), being generally satisfied with the received aftercare. Aftercare from GPs was received by 39% of patients, with 88% being satisfied with the GP's availability and 79% with referral to appropriate aftercare providers. Patients (> 50%) considered information-related items most important in aftercare. Overall, patients rated their satisfaction with aftercare 8/10 (7-9) points. Those who received medical rehabilitation (versus no rehabilitation, adjusted beta 0.61 [95%CI 0.11 to 1.11], p = 0.02) or aftercare by a hospital medical specialist (1.1 [0.46 to 1.64], p < 0.001) or GP (0.39 [0.053 to 0.72], p = 0.023) reported significantly higher satisfaction than those without such aftercare. Unmet needs were reported by 35% of patients, with lack of information (20%) and lack of additional aftercare and/or involvement of their GP (19%) being the most frequently reported.

Conclusion: Despite the forced quick development of COVID-19 aftercare, patients were generally satisfied. Follow-up by healthcare professionals and information provision is important to meet patients' aftercare needs.

References
1.
Houben-Wilke S, Delbressine J, Vaes A, Goertz Y, Meys R, Machado F . Understanding and Being Understood: Information and Care Needs of 2113 Patients With Confirmed or Suspected COVID-19. J Patient Exp. 2021; 8:2374373521997222. PMC: 8205416. DOI: 10.1177/2374373521997222. View

2.
Chilunga F, Appelman B, van Vugt M, Kalverda K, Smeele P, van Es J . Differences in incidence, nature of symptoms, and duration of long COVID among hospitalised migrant and non-migrant patients in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023; 29:100630. PMC: 10079482. DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100630. View

3.
Valenzuela C, Nigro M, Chalmers J, Wagers S, Avinash A, Hellemons M . COVID-19 follow-up programs across Europe: an ERS END-COVID CRC survey. Eur Respir J. 2022; 60(3. PMC: 9474896. DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00923-2022. View

4.
Berentschot J, Heijenbrok-Kal M, Bek L, Huijts S, Van Bommel J, van Genderen M . Physical recovery across care pathways up to 12 months after hospitalization for COVID-19: A multicenter prospective cohort study (CO-FLOW). Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022; 22:100485. PMC: 9402257. DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100485. View

5.
Mitchell U, Chebli P, Ruggiero L, Muramatsu N . The Digital Divide in Health-Related Technology Use: The Significance of Race/Ethnicity. Gerontologist. 2018; 59(1):6-14. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gny138. View