Effectiveness of Web-based Interventions for Women with Urinary Incontinence: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

Overview

Journal BMJ Open

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2024 Mar 29

PMID 38553066

Authors

Xuefen Xu

Pingping Guo

Ping Xu

Dan Dan Chen

Weijing Chen

Hongyan Wang

Ying Jin

Xiaojuan Wang

Wei Zhang

Fang Xie

Minna Mao

Rujia Zhao

Suwen Feng

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Urinary incontinence (UI) is one of the most common chronic diseases among women, which can endanger their physical and mental health and incur a heavy financial burden on both individuals and society. Web-based interventions (WBIs) have been applied to manage women's UI, but their effectiveness has remained inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to explore the effectiveness of WBIs on self-reported symptom severity, condition-specific quality of life, adherence to pelvic floor muscle training (primary outcomes) and other extensive secondary outcomes among women with UI. We also aimed to investigate whether intervention characteristics (format, interactivity and main technology) have impacts on the effectiveness of primary outcomes.

Methods And Analysis: This systematic review protocol was developed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols guidelines. 10 electronic databases will be comprehensively searched from their inception to 1 May 2024, along with grey literature searches and manual reviews of relevant reference lists to identify eligible randomised controlled trials. The methodological quality of the included studies will be assessed by two reviewers based on the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Meta-analyses will be conducted via Stata V.12.0. Leave-one-out sensitivity analyses will be performed, and publication bias will be evaluated using funnel plots and Egger's test. Subgroup analyses regarding intervention format, interactivity and main technology will be carried out.

Ethics And Dissemination: No ethics approval is needed for this review since no primary data are to be collected. The results of this review will help develop an optimal WBI for women with UI, thereby providing them with maximum benefits. The findings will be disseminated via a peer-reviewed journal or conference presentation.

Prospero Registration Number: CRD42023435047.

References

Dumoulin C, Cacciari L, Hay-Smith E . Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 10:CD005654. PMC: 6516955. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005654.pub4. View

Gonzalez G, Vaculik K, Khalil C, Zektser Y, Arnold C, Almario C . Women's Experience with Stress Urinary Incontinence: Insights from Social Media Analytics. J Urol. 2019; 203(5):962-968. PMC: 9354536. DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000706. View

Bo K, Frawley H, Haylen B, Abramov Y, Almeida F, Berghmans B . An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for the conservative and nonpharmacological management of female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2016; 28(2):191-213. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-016-3123-4. View

Bjork A, Sjostrom M, Johansson E, Samuelsson E, Umefjord G . Women's experiences of internet-based or postal treatment for stress urinary incontinence. Qual Health Res. 2014; 24(4):484-93. DOI: 10.1177/1049732314524486. View

Guo P, Li P, Zhang X, Liu N, Wang J, Yang S . The effectiveness of aromatherapy on preoperative anxiety in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020; 111:103747. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103747. View

Xu P, Wang X, Guo P, Zhang W, Mao M, Feng S . The effectiveness of eHealth interventions on female pelvic floor dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2022; 33(12):3325-3354. PMC: 9135393. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-022-05222-5. View

Deslauriers S, Raymond M, Laliberte M, Lavoie A, Desmeules F, Feldman D . Access to publicly funded outpatient physiotherapy services in Quebec: waiting lists and management strategies. Disabil Rehabil. 2016; 39(26):2648-2656. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1238967. View

Leng M, Zhao Y, Xiao H, Li C, Wang Z . Internet-Based Supportive Interventions for Family Caregivers of People With Dementia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(9):e19468. PMC: 7511858. DOI: 10.2196/19468. View

Higgins J, Altman D, Gotzsche P, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman A . The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011; 343:d5928. PMC: 3196245. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d5928. View

10.

Imamura M, Hudson J, Wallace S, MacLennan G, Shimonovich M, Omar M . Surgical interventions for women with stress urinary incontinence: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2019; 365:l1842. PMC: 6549286. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l1842. View

11.

Hou Y, Feng S, Tong B, Lu S, Jin Y . Effect of pelvic floor muscle training using mobile health applications for stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review. BMC Womens Health. 2022; 22(1):400. PMC: 9531466. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-022-01985-7. View

12.

Milsom I, Gyhagen M . The prevalence of urinary incontinence. Climacteric. 2018; 22(3):217-222. DOI: 10.1080/13697137.2018.1543263. View

13.

Niu X, Chi J, Guo J, Ruan H, Zhang J, Tao H . Effects of nurse-led web-based interventions on people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare. 2021; 27(5):269-279. DOI: 10.1177/1357633X211010019. View

14.

Bernard S, Boucher S, McLean L, Moffet H . Mobile technologies for the conservative self-management of urinary incontinence: a systematic scoping review. Int Urogynecol J. 2019; 31(6):1163-1174. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-019-04012-w. View

15.

Jaffar A, Mohd Sidik S, Foo C, Muhammad N, Abdul Manaf R, Suhaili N . Preliminary Effectiveness of mHealth App-Based Pelvic Floor Muscle Training among Pregnant Women to Improve Their Exercise Adherence: A Pilot Randomised Control Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(4). PMC: 8872112. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19042332. View

16.

Pang H, Lv J, Xu T, Gong J, Liu Q, Wang Y . Incidence and risk factors of female urinary incontinence: a 4-year longitudinal study among 24 985 adult women in China. BJOG. 2021; 129(4):580-589. PMC: 9298368. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16936. View

17.

Weinstein M, Collins S, Quiroz L, Anger J, Paraiso M, DeLong J . Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training with a Motion-based Digital Therapeutic Device versus Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Alone for Treatment of Stress-predominant Urinary Incontinence. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021; 28(1):1-6. DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001052. View

18.

Albers-Heitner P, Lagro-Janssen T, Venema P, Berghmans B, Winkens R, de Jonge A . Experiences and attitudes of nurse specialists in primary care regarding their role in care for patients with urinary incontinence. Scand J Caring Sci. 2010; 25(2):303-10. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2010.00827.x. View

19.

Todhunter-Brown A, Hazelton C, Campbell P, Elders A, Hagen S, McClurg D . Conservative interventions for treating urinary incontinence in women: an Overview of Cochrane systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022; 9:CD012337. PMC: 9437962. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012337.pub2. View

20.

Pedersen L, Lose G, Hoybye M, Jurgensen M, Waldmann A, Rudnicki M . Predictors and reasons for help-seeking behavior among women with urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2017; 29(4):521-530. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-017-3434-0. View