» Articles » PMID: 38551680

Origin and Significance of Leucine-rich Glioma-inactivated 1 Antibodies in Cerebrospinal Fluid

Overview
Journal Neurol Sci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2024 Mar 29
PMID 38551680
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Whether antibodies against leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 (LGI1-Abs) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are partially transferred from serum and the impact of CSF-LGI1-Ab positivity on clinical features and prognosis are unclear. Therefore, we aim to investigate the differences in serum titers, clinical features, and outcomes between LGI1-Ab CSF-positive and LGI1-Ab CSF-negative patients.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of serum titers and clinical features according to CSF LGI1-Ab status. In addition, univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to identify predictors of worse outcomes.

Results: A total of 60 patients with anti-LGI1 encephalitis and positive serum LGI1-Abs were identified, of whom 8 (13.3%) patients were excluded due to the absence of CSF LGI1-Ab testing. Among the remaining 52 patients, 33 (63.5%) were positive for LGI1-Abs in CSF. CSF-positive patients were more likely to have high serum titers (≥ 1:100) than CSF-negative patients (p = 0.003), and Spearman's correlation analysis showed a positive correlation between CSF and serum titers in CSF-positive patients (r = 0.405, p = 0.019). Psychiatric symptoms and hyponatremia were more frequent in CSF-positive patients (p < 0.05). Both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that CSF LGI1-Ab positivity and delayed immunotherapy are independent risk factors for incomplete recovery (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) > 0 at last follow-up).

Conclusions: LGI1-Ab CSF-positive patients have higher serum titers, and their CSF titers are positively correlated with serum titers, indicating a possible peripheral origin of CSF LGI1-Abs. CSF-positive patients more often present with psychiatric symptoms, hyponatremia, and worse outcomes, suggesting more severe neuronal damage.

References
1.
Graus F, Titulaer M, Balu R, Benseler S, Bien C, Cellucci T . A clinical approach to diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis. Lancet Neurol. 2016; 15(4):391-404. PMC: 5066574. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00401-9. View

2.
Zuliani L, Marangoni S, De Gaspari P, Rosellini I, Nosadini M, Fleming J . Epidemiology of neuronal surface antibody-mediated autoimmune encephalitis and antibody-based diagnostics. J Neuroimmunol. 2021; 357:577598. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2021.577598. View

3.
van Sonderen A, Thijs R, Coenders E, Jiskoot L, Sanchez E, de Bruijn M . Anti-LGI1 encephalitis: Clinical syndrome and long-term follow-up. Neurology. 2016; 87(14):1449-1456. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003173. View

4.
Ramberger M, Berretta A, Tan J, Sun B, Michael S, Yeo T . Distinctive binding properties of human monoclonal LGI1 autoantibodies determine pathogenic mechanisms. Brain. 2020; 143(6):1731-1745. PMC: 7296845. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awaa104. View

5.
Cui L, Boltze J, Zhang Y . Positive LGI1 Antibodies in CSF and Relapse Relate to Worse Outcome in Anti-LGI1 Encephalitis. Front Immunol. 2022; 12:772096. PMC: 8718904. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.772096. View