» Articles » PMID: 38551479

The First Robotic-assisted Hysterectomy Below the Bikini Line with the Dexter Robotic System™

Overview
Date 2024 Mar 29
PMID 38551479
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Robotic-assisted hysterectomy (RAH) is a widely accepted minimally invasive approach for uterus removal. However, as RAH is typically performed in the umbilical region, it usually results in scars in cosmetically suboptimal locations. This is the first case of RAH with cervicosacropexy performed below the bikini line, using the new Dexter robotic system™.

Objectives: The aim of this article is to show the surgical steps of the first RAH with cervicosacropexy performed below the bikini line with the new Dexter robotic system™ (Distalmotion), and furthermore assess the feasibility of this approach using this robotic platform.

Materials And Methods: A 43-year-old woman with uterine adenomyosis and recurrent uterine prolapse underwent a robotic-assisted subtotal hysterectomy with cervicosacropexy, performed below the bikini line, using the Dexter robotic system™, at the Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics at Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKHS) in Kiel, Germany.

Main Outcome Measures: Perioperative data, surgical approach specifics, objective, and subjective outcomes of this new approach.

Results: The procedure was performed without intra-operative complications; estimated blood loss was 10 ml. Operative time was 150 minutes, console time 120 minutes, total docking time 6 minutes. Dexter performed as expected; no device-related issues or robotic arm collisions occurred. The patient did not require pain medication and was released on the second postoperative day.

Conclusion: RAH performed below the bikini line using the Dexter robotic system™ is a feasible, safe, and adequate procedure. These initial results should be confirmed and further extensively refurbished with larger patient cohorts, and functional and psychological outcomes need further investigation.

Citing Articles

Robotic minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair with the Dexter robotic system™: A prospective multicenter clinical investigation.

Gantner L, Mignot H, Pochhammer J, Grieder F, Breitenstein S Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(12):7647-7655.

PMID: 39542890 PMC: 11615000. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11361-1.


The Combination of Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery: First Experience with the Dexter Robotic System™ in Visceral Surgery.

Conrad P, Mehdorn A, Alkatout I, Becker T, Beckmann J, Pochhammer J Life (Basel). 2024; 14(7).

PMID: 39063627 PMC: 11277731. DOI: 10.3390/life14070874.

References
1.
Goebel K, Goldberg J . Women's preference of cosmetic results after gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013; 21(1):64-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.05.004. View

2.
Elessawy M, Schneekloth S, Gunther V, Maass N, Mettler L, Alkatout I . Postoperative Telephone-Based Questionnaire on Quality of Life after Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy versus Conventional Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. J Clin Med. 2020; 9(9). PMC: 7565397. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9092849. View

3.
Chi-Hsiang Wu J, Wu H, Lin M, Chou D, Huang M . Comparison of robot-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy with traditional laparoscopic adrenalectomy - 1 year follow-up. Surg Endosc. 2007; 22(2):463-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9488-1. View

4.
Gitas G, Alkatout I, Proppe L, Hanker L, Allahqoli L, Grimbizis G . Long-term satisfaction of patients after laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021; 305(6):1481-1490. PMC: 9166875. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-021-06360-9. View

5.
DeLancey J . Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 166(6 Pt 1):1717-24; discussion 1724-8. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91562-o. View