» Articles » PMID: 38550314

Prevalence and Associated Factors of Burnout Among Working Adults in Southeast Asia: Results from a Public Health Assessment

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2024 Mar 29
PMID 38550314
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has spotlighted the mental health crisis among employees worldwide. However, burnout research is often industry- or occupation-specific, and limited knowledge currently exists on the prevalence of burnout in the general working population of Southeast Asia. This study aims to examine the prevalence of employee burnout and its associated factors among working adults in Southeast Asia using secondary data. 4,338 full-time employees aged 18-65 years old living in Malaysia, Singapore, Philippines, and Indonesia were assessed for burnout, depression, anxiety, stress, and sociodemographic characteristics as part of an online public health assessment in October 2022. The prevalence of burnout in the region was 62.91%. Burnout was highest among employees in the Philippines (70.71%) and lowest in Malaysia (58.13%). Experiencing burnout was associated with severe or extremely severe depression (AOR = 6.48 [95% CI = 5.06-8.33]), anxiety (AOR = 2.22 [1.74-2.85]), and stress (AOR = 5.51 [4.13-7.39]). Working more than 50 hours a week (AOR = 1.38 [1.04-1.82]) and being very dissatisfied with the job led to higher odds of burnout (AOR = 16.46 [8.99-30.53]). Alarmingly, more than half of working adults in the region are reporting increased levels of burnout, and improving employee mental health and work conditions may be key to improving employee burnout in the region. Findings contribute to existing research on burnout prevalence in the region and provide more comprehensive insights into understanding the factors driving employee burnout in the working population of Southeast Asia 2 years after the onset of the pandemic.

Citing Articles

Prevalence and the associated factors of burnout among the critical healthcare professionals during the post-pandemic era: a multi-institutional survey in Taiwan with a systematic review of the Asian literatures.

Lee Y, Dai J, Li X, Chiang M, Chen P, Lin Y BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):3480.

PMID: 39696276 PMC: 11657180. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-21084-6.

References
1.
Arya R, Antonisamy B, Kumar S . Sample size estimation in prevalence studies. Indian J Pediatr. 2012; 79(11):1482-8. DOI: 10.1007/s12098-012-0763-3. View

2.
Voglino G, Savatteri A, Gualano M, Catozzi D, Rousset S, Boietti E . How the reduction of working hours could influence health outcomes: a systematic review of published studies. BMJ Open. 2022; 12(4):e051131. PMC: 8977802. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051131. View

3.
Ghahramani S, Bagheri Lankarani K, Yousefi M, Heydari K, Shahabi S, Azmand S . A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Burnout Among Healthcare Workers During COVID-19. Front Psychiatry. 2021; 12:758849. PMC: 8631719. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.758849. View

4.
Marroquin B, Vine V, Morgan R . Mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: Effects of stay-at-home policies, social distancing behavior, and social resources. Psychiatry Res. 2020; 293:113419. PMC: 7439968. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113419. View

5.
Naing L, Nordin R, Rahman H, Naing Y . Sample size calculation for prevalence studies using Scalex and ScalaR calculators. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022; 22(1):209. PMC: 9338613. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-022-01694-7. View