» Articles » PMID: 38547422

Toward Informed Selection and Interpretation of Clinical Genomic Tests in Prostate Cancer

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Mar 28
PMID 38547422
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Clinical genomic testing of patient germline, tumor tissue, or plasma cell-free DNA can enable a personalized approach to cancer management and treatment. In prostate cancer (PCa), broad genotyping tests are now widely used to identify germline and/or somatic alterations in and other DNA damage repair genes. Alterations in these genes can confer cancer sensitivity to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, are linked with poor prognosis, and can have potential hereditary cancer implications for family members. However, there is huge variability in genomic tests and reporting standards, meaning that for successful implementation of testing in clinical practice, end users must carefully select the most appropriate test for a given patient and critically interpret the results. In this white paper, we outline key pre- and post-test considerations for choosing a genomic test and evaluating reported variants, specifically for patients with advanced PCa. Test choice must be based on clinical context and disease state, availability and suitability of tumor tissue, and the genes and regions that are covered by the test. We describe strategies to recognize false positives or negatives in test results, including frameworks to assess low tumor fraction, subclonal alterations, clonal hematopoiesis, and pathogenic versus nonpathogenic variants. We assume that improved understanding among health care professionals and researchers of the nuances associated with genomic testing will ultimately lead to optimal patient care and clinical decision making.

Citing Articles

False-Positive Circulating Tumor DNA Results Do Not Explain Lack of Efficacy for PARP Inhibitors in Patients With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Harboring and Mutations.

Fallah J, Xu J, Joeng H, Weinstock C, Heiss B, Maguire W JCO Precis Oncol. 2024; 8:e2400354.

PMID: 39208375 PMC: 11371381. DOI: 10.1200/PO.24.00354.


Liquid Biopsy in the Clinical Management of Cancers.

Ho H, Chung K, Kan C, Wong S Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(16).

PMID: 39201281 PMC: 11354853. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25168594.


Using early on-treatment circulating tumor DNA measurements as response assessment in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer.

Tolmeijer S, Boerrigter E, Van Erp N, Mehra N Oncotarget. 2024; 15:421-423.

PMID: 38953903 PMC: 11218791. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.28599.

References
1.
Rawla P . Epidemiology of Prostate Cancer. World J Oncol. 2019; 10(2):63-89. PMC: 6497009. DOI: 10.14740/wjon1191. View

2.
Bettegowda C, Sausen M, Leary R, Kinde I, Wang Y, Agrawal N . Detection of circulating tumor DNA in early- and late-stage human malignancies. Sci Transl Med. 2014; 6(224):224ra24. PMC: 4017867. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3007094. View

3.
Loehr A, Hussain A, Patnaik A, Bryce A, Castellano D, Font A . Emergence of BRCA Reversion Mutations in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer After Treatment with Rucaparib. Eur Urol. 2022; 83(3):200-209. PMC: 10398818. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.09.010. View

4.
Mehra N, Kloots I, Vlaming M, Aluwini S, Dewulf E, Oprea-Lager D . Genetic Aspects and Molecular Testing in Prostate Cancer: A Report from a Dutch Multidisciplinary Consensus Meeting. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023; 49:23-31. PMC: 9975012. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.11.011. View

5.
Robinson D, Van Allen E, Wu Y, Schultz N, Lonigro R, Mosquera J . Integrative clinical genomics of advanced prostate cancer. Cell. 2015; 161(5):1215-1228. PMC: 4484602. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.001. View