» Articles » PMID: 38547215

National Clinical and Financial Outcomes Associated with Acute Kidney Injury Following Esophagectomy for Cancer

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2024 Mar 28
PMID 38547215
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Esophagectomy is a complex oncologic operation associated with high rates of postoperative complications. While respiratory and septic complications have been well-defined, the implications of acute kidney injury (AKI) remain unclear. Using a nationally representative database, we aimed to characterize the association of AKI with mortality, resource use, and 30-day readmission.

Methods: All adults undergoing elective esophagectomy with a diagnosis of esophageal or gastric cancer were identified in the 2010-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Study cohorts were stratified based on presence of AKI. Multivariable regressions and Royston-Parmar survival analysis were used to evaluate the independent association between AKI and outcomes of interest.

Results: Of an estimated 40,438 patients, 3,210 (7.9%) developed AKI. Over the 10-year study period, the incidence of AKI increased from 6.4% to 9.7%. Prior radiation/chemotherapy and minimally invasive operations were associated with reduced odds of AKI, whereas public insurance coverage and concurrent infectious and respiratory complications had greater risk of AKI. After risk adjustment, AKI remained independently associated with greater odds of in-hospital mortality (AOR: 4.59, 95% CI: 3.62-5.83) and had significantly increased attributable costs ($112,000 vs $54,000) and length of stay (25.7 vs 13.3 days) compared to patients without AKI. Furthermore, AKI demonstrated significantly increased hazard of 30-day readmission (hazard ratio: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.01-1.32).

Conclusions: AKI after esophagectomy is associated with greater risk of mortality, hospitalization costs, and 30-day readmission. Given the significant adverse consequences of AKI, careful perioperative management to mitigate this complication may improve quality of esophageal surgical care at the national level.

References
1.
Prowle J, Bellomo R . Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: macrohemodynamic and microhemodynamic alterations in the renal circulation. Semin Nephrol. 2015; 35(1):64-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2015.01.007. View

2.
Gray K, Nobel T, Hsu M, Tan K, Chudgar N, Yan S . Improved Preoperative Risk Assessment Tools Are Needed to Guide Informed Decision Making before Esophagectomy. Ann Surg. 2020; 277(1):116-120. PMC: 8211904. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004715. View

3.
Mohri J, Katada C, Ueda M, Sugawara M, Yamashita K, Moriya H . Predisposing Factors for Chemotherapy-induced Nephrotoxicity in Patients with Advanced Esophageal Cancer Who Received Combination Chemotherapy with Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil. J Transl Int Med. 2018; 6(1):32-37. PMC: 5874485. DOI: 10.2478/jtim-2018-0007. View

4.
Royston P, Parmar M . Restricted mean survival time: an alternative to the hazard ratio for the design and analysis of randomized trials with a time-to-event outcome. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013; 13:152. PMC: 3922847. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-152. View

5.
Thomas M, Blaine C, Dawnay A, Devonald M, Ftouh S, Laing C . The definition of acute kidney injury and its use in practice. Kidney Int. 2014; 87(1):62-73. DOI: 10.1038/ki.2014.328. View