» Articles » PMID: 38542901

Experimental and Computational Methods to Assess Central Nervous System Penetration of Small Molecules

Overview
Journal Molecules
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 Mar 28
PMID 38542901
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In CNS drug discovery, the estimation of brain exposure to lead compounds is critical for their optimization. Compounds need to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) to reach the pharmacological targets in the CNS. The BBB is a complex system involving passive and active mechanisms of transport and efflux transporters such as P-glycoproteins (P-gp) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), which play an essential role in CNS penetration of small molecules. Several in vivo, in vitro, and in silico methods are available to estimate human brain penetration. Preclinical species are used as in vivo models to understand unbound brain exposure by deriving the Kp,uu parameter and the brain/plasma ratio of exposure corrected with the plasma and brain free fraction. The MDCK-mdr1 (Madin Darby canine kidney cells transfected with the MDR1 gene encoding for the human P-gp) assay is the commonly used in vitro assay to estimate compound permeability and human efflux. The in silico methods to predict brain exposure, such as CNS MPO, CNS BBB scores, and various machine learning models, help save costs and speed up compound discovery and optimization at all stages. These methods enable the screening of virtual compounds, building of a CNS penetrable compounds library, and optimization of lead molecules for CNS penetration. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the reliability and ability of these methods to predict CNS penetration. We review the in silico, in vitro, and in vivo data and their correlation with each other, as well as assess published experimental and computational approaches to predict the BBB penetrability of compounds.

Citing Articles

Systematic Study of Steroid Drugs' Ability to Cross Biomembranes-The Possible Environmental Impact and Health Risks Associated with Exposure During Pregnancy.

Sobanska A, Orlikowska A, Famulska K, Bosnjak L, Bosiljevac D, Rasztawicka A Membranes (Basel). 2025; 15(1).

PMID: 39852245 PMC: 11766822. DOI: 10.3390/membranes15010004.


Log BB Prediction Models Using TLC and HPLC Retention Values as Protein Affinity Data.

Wanat K, Michalak K, Brzezinska E Pharmaceutics. 2025; 16(12.

PMID: 39771513 PMC: 11678311. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16121534.


Applicability of MDR1 Overexpressing Abcb1KO-MDCKII Cell Lines for Investigating In Vitro Species Differences and Brain Penetration Prediction.

Soskuti E, Szilvasy N, Temesszentandrasi-Ambrus C, Urban Z, Csikvari O, Szabo Z Pharmaceutics. 2024; 16(6).

PMID: 38931858 PMC: 11207571. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16060736.

References
1.
Umemori Y, Handa K, Sakamoto S, Kageyama M, Iijima T . QSAR model to predict K with a small dataset, incorporating predicted values of related parameter. SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2022; 33(11):885-897. DOI: 10.1080/1062936X.2022.2149619. View

2.
Komura H, Watanabe R, Mizuguchi K . The Trends and Future Prospective of In Silico Models from the Viewpoint of ADME Evaluation in Drug Discovery. Pharmaceutics. 2023; 15(11). PMC: 10675155. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15112619. View

3.
Miao R, Xia L, Chen H, Huang H, Liang Y . Improved Classification of Blood-Brain-Barrier Drugs Using Deep Learning. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):8802. PMC: 6584536. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-44773-4. View

4.
Norinder U, Haeberlein M . Computational approaches to the prediction of the blood-brain distribution. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2002; 54(3):291-313. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-409x(02)00005-4. View

5.
Chen J, Tseng Y . A general optimization protocol for molecular property prediction using a deep learning network. Brief Bioinform. 2021; 23(1). PMC: 8769690. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbab367. View