Virtual Consultation in Dermatology: Access Inequalities According to Socioeconomic Characteristics and the Place of Residence

Overview

Journal Healthcare (Basel)

Specialty Health Services

Date 2024 Mar 28

PMID 38540621

Authors

Almudena Marco-Ibanez

Carlos Aibar-Remon

Adriana Gamba-Cabezas

Lina Maldonado

Isabel Aguilar-Palacio

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Virtual consultation has been implemented as a tool to improve the cooperation and coordination between primary care and other specialties. However, in its use in dermatology, inequities have been described. The aim of this study was to identify individual and geographical factors affecting the likelihood of accessing this resource. We conducted a cross-sectional study. The study population was individuals living in Aragón, a region in the north-east of Spain, who were users of the Aragon Health Service in 2021. To explore the differences in individual and area characteristics, between patients with virtual and non-virtual dermatology consultation, we performed bivariate analyses. To analyse the use of virtual consultation in dermatology, a multilevel methodology stratified by sex was developed. We analysed 39,174 dermatology visits, with 16,910 being virtual (43.17%). The rates of virtual consultation were higher in urban areas and the most affluent areas, for older persons, chronic complex patients and people with more advantageous socioeconomic positions. The best multilevel model conducted showed inequalities by socioeconomic position and area of residence. There are individual and area inequalities in the use of teledermatology. As this tool should improve equity of access, teledermatology interventions must address and adapt to the needs of the local patient population.

References

Bakhtiar M, Elbuluk N, Lipoff J . The digital divide: How COVID-19's telemedicine expansion could exacerbate disparities. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020; 83(5):e345-e346. PMC: 7365110. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.07.043. View

G Bianchi M, Santos A, Cordioli E . Benefits of Teledermatology for Geriatric Patients: Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(4):e16700. PMC: 7201316. DOI: 10.2196/16700. View

Foltz E, Witkowski A, Ludzik J . Urban rural utilization of teledermoscopy in self-skin examinations: preliminary results of a cohort study in the states of Oregon and Washington, USA. Dermatol Reports. 2023; 15(2):9627. PMC: 10327663. DOI: 10.4081/dr.2023.9627. View

Marco-Ibanez A, Aguilar-Palacio I, Aibar C . Does virtual consultation between primary and specialised care improve healthcare quality? A scoping review of healthcare quality domains assessment. BMJ Open Qual. 2023; 12(4). PMC: 10582872. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002388. View

van der Heijden J, de Keizer N, Bos J, Spuls P, Witkamp L . Teledermatology applied following patient selection by general practitioners in daily practice improves efficiency and quality of care at lower cost. Br J Dermatol. 2011; 165(5):1058-65. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10509.x. View

Pierce R, Stevermer J . Disparities in the use of telehealth at the onset of the COVID-19 public health emergency. J Telemed Telecare. 2020; 29(1):3-9. PMC: 7578842. DOI: 10.1177/1357633X20963893. View

Pasquali P, Romero-Aguilera G, Moreno-Ramirez D . Teledermatology before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed). 2020; 112(4):324-329. PMC: 8015014. DOI: 10.1016/j.ad.2020.11.008. View

Augustin J, Erasmi S, Reusch M, Augustin M . Methods of analyzing regional dermatological care as exemplified by the city of Hamburg. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2015; 13(7):661-73. DOI: 10.1111/ddg.12626. View

Buster K, Stevens E, Elmets C . Dermatologic health disparities. Dermatol Clin. 2011; 30(1):53-9, viii. PMC: 3742002. DOI: 10.1016/j.det.2011.08.002. View

10.

Augustin M, Wimmer J, Biedermann T, Blaga R, Dierks C, Djamei V . Praxis der Teledermatologie. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2018; 16 Suppl 5:6-57. DOI: 10.1111/ddg.13512. View

11.

Bernal-Delgado E, Garcia-Armesto S, Oliva J, Sanchez Martinez F, Repullo J, Pena-Longobardo L . Spain: Health System Review. Health Syst Transit. 2018; 20(2):1-179. View

12.

Pavon de Paz I, Rosado Sierra J, Salguero Ropero A, Viedma Torres V, Guijarro de Armas G, Cuesta Rodriguez-Torices M . [E-consultation as a tool for the relationship between Primary Care and Endocrinology. Impact of COVID-19 epidemic in its use]. J Healthc Qual Res. 2021; 37(3):155-161. PMC: 9847372. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2021.10.006. View

13.

Ahuja S, Briggs S, Collier S . Teledermatology in Rural, Underserved, and Isolated Environments: A Review. Curr Dermatol Rep. 2022; 11(4):328-335. PMC: 9589860. DOI: 10.1007/s13671-022-00377-2. View

14.

Liddy C, Joschko J, Guglani S, Afkham A, Keely E . Improving Equity of Access Through Electronic Consultation: A Case Study of an eConsult Service. Front Public Health. 2019; 7:279. PMC: 6787760. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00279. View

15.

Maddukuri S, Patel J, Lipoff J . Teledermatology Addressing Disparities in Health Care Access: a Review. Curr Dermatol Rep. 2021; 10(2):40-47. PMC: 7953516. DOI: 10.1007/s13671-021-00329-2. View

16.

Wurm E, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Wurm R, Soyer H . Telemedicine and teledermatology: Past, present and future. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2007; 6(2):106-12. DOI: 10.1111/j.1610-0387.2007.06440.x. View

17.

Marwaha S, Fevrier H, Alexeeff S, Crowley E, Haiman M, Pham N . Comparative effectiveness study of face-to-face and teledermatology workflows for diagnosing skin cancer. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019; 81(5):1099-1106. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.01.067. View

18.

Compes Dea M, Olivan Bellido E, Feja Solana C, Aguilar Palacio I, Garcia-Carpintero Romero Del Hombrebueno G, Adiego Sancho B . [Construction of a deprivation index by Basic Healthcare Area in Aragon using Population and Housing Census 2011]. Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2018; 92. PMC: 11587363. View

19.

Hayre J, Cirelli C, Sharma M . Teledermatology for the many, not the few: Tackling the racial health divide in a digital world. EClinicalMedicine. 2021; 37:101007. PMC: 8267535. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101007. View

20.

Armstrong A, Kwong M, Ledo L, Nesbitt T, Shewry S . Practice models and challenges in teledermatology: a study of collective experiences from teledermatologists. PLoS One. 2011; 6(12):e28687. PMC: 3237480. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028687. View