» Articles » PMID: 38540571

Political Leaders' Communication Strategies During COVID-19 in Highly Infected Countries: A Scoping Review

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2024 Mar 28
PMID 38540571
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This scoping review maps communication strategies employed by political leaders in countries that experienced high infection rates during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using the Arksey and O'Malley scoping review framework, this study systematically explored the literature from 2019 to October 2023. The process involved identifying and selecting relevant studies, charting them, and summarizing the data from the 40 articles that met the inclusion criteria. This review identified a diverse array of communication strategies, which highlight the complex nature of crisis communication. These strategies featured the use of social media, science-based policy communication, strategic narrative control, empathy, ideological influences, and storytelling. These six approaches underscore the importance of adaptability and context-specific strategies in political leadership during a health crisis. The findings demonstrate that political communication during the pandemic varied significantly and was influenced by factors such as media platform, political ideology, gender, and non-verbal cues. This review enriches our understanding of crisis communication in political contexts. It emphasizes the necessity of combining traditional and digital media and considering various sociopolitical factors. The insights gained are crucial for enhancing crisis management and public trust, and they set the stage for further research and practical application in crisis communication.

Citing Articles

Exploring barriers to adherence to COVID-19 infection control measures and advice among immigrants in Norway: A qualitative study.

Kour P, Saebo G, Buvik K, Scheffels J, Vedaa O, Indseth T J Migr Health. 2025; 11():100292.

PMID: 39845263 PMC: 11750522. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmh.2024.100292.


Topic modelling and sentiment analysis during COVID-19 revealed emotions changes for public health.

Figueiredo S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):24954.

PMID: 39438522 PMC: 11496542. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-75209-3.


Religious beliefs and practices toward HPV vaccine acceptance in Islamic countries: A scoping review.

Kisa S, Kisa A PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0309597.

PMID: 39208300 PMC: 11361683. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309597.


A Comprehensive Analysis of COVID-19 Misinformation, Public Health Impacts, and Communication Strategies: Scoping Review.

Kisa S, Kisa A J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e56931.

PMID: 39167790 PMC: 11375383. DOI: 10.2196/56931.

References
1.
Drescher L, Roosen J, Aue K, Dressel K, Schar W, Gotz A . The Spread of COVID-19 Crisis Communication by German Public Authorities and Experts on Twitter: Quantitative Content Analysis. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021; 7(12):e31834. PMC: 8698804. DOI: 10.2196/31834. View

2.
Scholz J, Wetzker W, Licht A, Heintzmann R, Scherag A, Weis S . The role of risk communication in public health interventions. An analysis of risk communication for a community quarantine in Germany to curb the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. PLoS One. 2021; 16(8):e0256113. PMC: 8362954. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256113. View

3.
Gollust S, Nagler R, Fowler E . The Emergence of COVID-19 in the US: A Public Health and Political Communication Crisis. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2020; 45(6):967-981. DOI: 10.1215/03616878-8641506. View

4.
Chang C . Cross-Country Comparison of Effects of Early Government Communication on Personal Empowerment during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Taiwan and the United States. Health Commun. 2020; 37(4):476-489. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1852698. View

5.
Peters M, Marnie C, Tricco A, Pollock D, Munn Z, Alexander L . Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Implement. 2021; 19(1):3-10. DOI: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000277. View