» Articles » PMID: 38536324

Perceptions of Purpose, Cohesion, and Military Leadership: A Path Analysis of Potential Primary Prevention Targets to Mitigate Suicidal Ideation

Overview
Journal Mil Psychol
Date 2024 Mar 27
PMID 38536324
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rates of suicide in the US Army continue to rise, and by some accounts exceed the general population. This increase has renewed efforts to identify protective factors that may inform novel suicide prevention strategies. Previous research has demonstrated that a sense of purpose in life and perceived cohesion with military peers are related to a reduction in the severity of suicidal ideation (SI). Additionally, research in military samples supports decreased SI in Soldiers who endorse that their leaders convey a sense of purpose and meaning in their shared mission. However, no work has investigated whether these leadership styles relate to a sense of felt purpose and perceived cohesion in Soldiers and thus the indirect effect of these leadership styles on SI. Active duty Army Soldiers (n = 1,160) completed self-report measures of purpose in life (PiL), perceived cohesion, ethical leadership, loneliness, and SI. Indirect effect analyses were conducted to determine how leadership behaviors indirectly relate to SI through PiL and perceived cohesion. Indirect effect analyses revealed that ethical leadership had an indirect effect on reduced SI through increased PiL. In the same parallel indirect effect analysis, ethical leadership was related to less SI through increased perceived cohesion and decreased loneliness sequentially. Enhanced leadership training that effectively increases Soldier purpose may be an important primary prevention tool to mitigate the effect of suicide risk factors. This primary prevention strategy may help augment existing suicide surveillance and clinical prevention efforts to reduce Soldier risk for suicide.

Citing Articles

Measurement validity of the six-factor model of psychological well-being in a military sample: Implications for measuring well-being in service members.

Trachik B, Fawver B, Trapp S, Goldberg S, Ganulin M, Kearns N Psychol Assess. 2023; 35(9):729-739.

PMID: 37470988 PMC: 10524694. DOI: 10.1037/pas0001239.


A bidirectional examination of mental health symptoms and perceptions of leader support: Which comes first?.

Bessey A, Black K, Britt T Mil Psychol. 2023; 35(2):119-131.

PMID: 37133493 PMC: 10013486. DOI: 10.1080/08995605.2022.2085957.

References
1.
Trachik B, Oakey-Frost N, Ganulin M, Adler A, Dretsch M, Cabrera O . Military suicide prevention: The importance of leadership behaviors as an upstream suicide prevention target. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2021; 51(2):316-324. DOI: 10.1111/sltb.12707. View

2.
Bass B, Avolio B, Jung D, Berson Y . Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. J Appl Psychol. 2003; 88(2):207-18. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.207. View

3.
Bryan C, Jennings K, Jobes D, Bradley J . Understanding and preventing military suicide. Arch Suicide Res. 2012; 16(2):95-110. DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2012.667321. View

4.
Rudd M, Bryan C, Wertenberger E, Peterson A, Young-McCaughan S, Mintz J . Brief cognitive-behavioral therapy effects on post-treatment suicide attempts in a military sample: results of a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up. Am J Psychiatry. 2015; 172(5):441-9. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.14070843. View

5.
Heisel M, Neufeld E, Flett G . Reasons for living, meaning in life, and suicide ideation: investigating the roles of key positive psychological factors in reducing suicide risk in community-residing older adults. Aging Ment Health. 2015; 20(2):195-207. DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2015.1078279. View