» Articles » PMID: 38536306

Examining Personality for the Selection and Classification of Soldiers: Validity and Differential Validity Across Jobs

Overview
Journal Mil Psychol
Date 2024 Mar 27
PMID 38536306
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A number of past studies have demonstrated that personality traits are modest predictors of workplace attitudes and behaviors and can provide incremental validity over cognitive ability. However, less is known about the utility of personality for job classification. In addition, concerns about the effects of faking on personality measures still remain. In this study, we examined the validity of a forced choice personality measure administered under operational conditions to explore the use of personality traits in high-stakes settings. In addition, we also examined the potential use of personality for classification into military occupational specialties (MOS). We explored these issues in a large sample of Soldiers from five different MOS to examine the prediction of performance during initial military training (IMT). Results indicated that composites of personality traits were valid predictors of performance and attrition and that these composites may be useful for classifying individuals into different military occupations. The implications of these results for Soldier selection and classification are discussed.

Citing Articles

Prediction of performance by non-cognitive traits.

Drasgow F Mil Psychol. 2024; 32(1):127-134.

PMID: 38536299 PMC: 10013377. DOI: 10.1080/08995605.2019.1652479.


The role of coast guard courage in the relationship between personality and organizational commitment.

Mert I, Koksal K Mil Psychol. 2024; 34(6):706-721.

PMID: 38536265 PMC: 10013258. DOI: 10.1080/08995605.2022.2057788.


The Relationship between Psychological Hardiness and Military Performance by Reservists: A Moderation Effect of Perceived Stress and Resilience.

Bekesiene S, Smaliukiene R, Kanapeckaite R Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(9).

PMID: 37174765 PMC: 10178462. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11091224.

References
1.
Hogan J, Barrett P, Hogan R . Personality measurement, faking, and employment selection. J Appl Psychol. 2007; 92(5):1270-85. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1270. View

2.
Judge T, Heller D, Mount M . Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2002; 87(3):530-41. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.530. View

3.
Judge T, Bono J, Ilies R, Gerhardt M . Personality and leadership: a qualitative and quantitative review. J Appl Psychol. 2002; 87(4):765-80. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.765. View

4.
Oh I, Berry C . The five-factor model of personality and managerial performance: validity gains through the use of 360 degree performance ratings. J Appl Psychol. 2009; 94(6):1498-513. DOI: 10.1037/a0017221. View

5.
Goldberg L . The structure of phenotypic personality traits. Am Psychol. 1993; 48(1):26-34. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.48.1.26. View