» Articles » PMID: 38533146

Less Is More: A Case Report on All-on-4 Prosthesis

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2024 Mar 27
PMID 38533146
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Severe alveolar ridge atrophy following tooth removal poses a common and worsening issue in edentulous jaws, affecting patient comfort and quality of life. The All-on-4 approach involves axially positioning two anterior implants and distally orienting two posterior implants, reducing cantilever length and enabling prostheses with 12 teeth. This less invasive option, utilizing distal tilting of implants at 30°, offers biomechanical advantages and has shown short-term success, though long-term research is limited. Immediate-loading treatments are gaining popularity for their high survival rates. Understanding the biomechanics of implant-supported prostheses is crucial for long-term success, emphasizing the importance of optimal occlusal schemes. Challenges such as bone defects and surgical complexity have led to the exploration of achieving full-arch fixed restorations with fewer implants, building upon Brånemark's early work with four implants. The All-on-4 concept, originating in 1999, proves to be a viable treatment option, providing excellent long-term results and improved load distribution in challenging clinical circumstances. This case report explores the successful rehabilitation of a jaw using the All-on-4 implant prosthesis concept, a technique strategically placing four implants in completely edentulous jaws to support a fixed, immediately loaded prosthesis.

Citing Articles

Clinical Outcomes of Single Tooth Implant Placement in the Mandibular Region: A Case Report.

Dajjuka B, Kambala S, Dhamande M, Minase D, Agrawal P Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e66379.

PMID: 39246892 PMC: 11379416. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.66379.


Zygomatic Implants in a Patient With History of Mucormycosis: A Case Report.

Minase D, Sathe S, Borle A, Mundada B, Doshi K Cureus. 2024; 16(7):e65512.

PMID: 39188455 PMC: 11346810. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.65512.

References
1.
Bevilacqua M, Tealdo T, Menini M, Pera F, Mossolov A, Drago C . The influence of cantilever length and implant inclination on stress distribution in maxillary implant-supported fixed dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 2011; 105(1):5-13. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60182-5. View

2.
Mattsson T, Kondell P, Gynther G, Fredholm U, Bolin A . Implant treatment without bone grafting in severely resorbed edentulous maxillae. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999; 57(3):281-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2391(99)90673-0. View

3.
Gerritsen A, Allen P, Witter D, Bronkhorst E, Creugers N . Tooth loss and oral health-related quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010; 8:126. PMC: 2992503. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-126. View

4.
Patzelt S, Bahat O, Reynolds M, Strub J . The all-on-four treatment concept: a systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013; 16(6):836-55. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12068. View

5.
Taruna M, Chittaranjan B, Sudheer N, Tella S, Abusaad M . Prosthodontic perspective to all-on-4® concept for dental implants. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014; 8(10):ZE16-9. PMC: 4253293. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/9648.5020. View