CT Comparison of the Nasal Airway Anterior and Posterior to the Piriform Aperture in Patients with and Without Nasal Obstruction

Overview

Journal Head Face Med

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialties Dentistry
General Medicine
Orthopedics

Date 2024 Mar 27

PMID 38532483

Authors

Helen Heppt

Gerlig Widmann

Felix Riechelmann

Annette Runge

Herbert Riechelmann

Aris I Giotakis

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Nasal airway stenosis may lie anterior and/or posterior to the piriform aperture. We intended to compare the nasal airway anterior and posterior to the piriform aperture in patients with and without nasal obstruction.

Methods: Segmented computed tomography cross-sectional areas of the nasal airway anterior (CT-CSA) and posterior to the piriform aperture (at the level of the head of the inferior turbinate; CT-CSA) were compared between patients with nasal obstruction (cases) and trauma controls. CT-CSA were approximately perpendicular to the direction of the nasal airflow. Anterior to the piriform aperture, they were tilted about 30, 60 and 90 to the nasal floor. Posterior to the piriform aperture, they were tilted about 50, 80 and 100 to the nasal floor. In cases, we examined the Pearson's correlation of active anterior rhinomanometry with CT-CSA and CT-CSA.

Results: Narrow and bilateral CT-CSA were similarly large between 56 cases and 56 controls (all p > 0.2). On the contrary, narrow and bilateral CT-CSA were significantly smaller in cases than in controls (all p < 0.001). The ratio of the size of CT-CSA to that of CT-CSA was significantly lower in cases (median: 0.84; lower to upper quartile: 0.55-1.13) than in controls (1.0; 0.88-1.16; Mann-Whitney U test; p = 0.006). Bilateral CT-CSA correlated significantly with total inspiratory flow (all p < 0.026) in contrast to bilateral CT-CSA (all p > 0.056).

Conclusions: The nasal airway anterior to the piriform aperture was smaller in patients with nasal obstruction due to skeletal nasal stenosis than that in controls. On the contrary, the nasal airway posterior to the piriform aperture was similarly large between patients with and without nasal obstruction. Furthermore, in patients with nasal obstruction, the anterior nasal airway was narrower compared to that located posterior to it. On the contrary, control patients' anterior nasal airway was as large as the posterior one.

References

Aziz T, Biron V, Ansari K, Flores-Mir C . Measurement tools for the diagnosis of nasal septal deviation: a systematic review. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014; 43:11. PMC: 4042609. DOI: 10.1186/1916-0216-43-11. View

Widmann G, Dangl M, Lutz E, Fleckenstein B, Offermanns V, Gassner E . Can ultra-low-dose computed tomography reliably diagnose and classify maxillofacial fractures in the clinical routine?. Imaging Sci Dent. 2023; 53(1):69-75. PMC: 10060755. DOI: 10.5624/isd.20220190. View

Andre R, Vuyk H, Ahmed A, Graamans K, Nolst Trenite G . Correlation between subjective and objective evaluation of the nasal airway. A systematic review of the highest level of evidence. Clin Otolaryngol. 2010; 34(6):518-25. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.02042.x. View

Riechelmann H, Widmann G, Kofler B, Arminger R, Url C, Giotakis A . Nasal Floor Asymmetry Is Associated With Nasal Obstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020; 78(10):1833.e1-1833.e9. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.05.011. View

Egeli E, Demirci L, Yazycy B, Harputluoglu U . Evaluation of the inferior turbinate in patients with deviated nasal septum by using computed tomography. Laryngoscope. 2004; 114(1):113-7. DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200401000-00020. View

Scadding G, Hellings P, Alobid I, Bachert C, Fokkens W, van Wijk R . Diagnostic tools in Rhinology EAACI position paper. Clin Transl Allergy. 2012; 1(1):2. PMC: 3294630. DOI: 10.1186/2045-7022-1-2. View

Cho G, Kim J, Jang Y . Correlation of nasal obstruction with nasal cross-sectional area measured by computed tomography in patients with nasal septal deviation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2012; 121(4):239-45. DOI: 10.1177/000348941212100409. View

Balbach L, Trinkel V, Guldner C, Bien S, Teymoortash A, Werner J . Radiological examinations of the anatomy of the inferior turbinate using digital volume tomography (DVT). Rhinology. 2011; 49(2):248-52. DOI: 10.4193/Rhino09.204. View

Janovic N, Janovic A, Milicic B, Djuric M . Relationship between nasal septum morphology and nasal obstruction symptom severity: computed tomography study. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2020; 88(5):663-668. PMC: 9483930. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.09.004. View

10.

Bang M, Choi S, Park J, Kang B, Kwon W, Lee T . Radiation Dose Reduction in Paranasal Sinus CT: With Feasibility of Iterative Reconstruction Technique. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016; 155(6):982-987. DOI: 10.1177/0194599816664335. View

11.

Kim C, Moon B, Jung D, Min Y . Correlation between nasal obstruction symptoms and objective parameters of acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry. Auris Nasus Larynx. 1998; 25(1):45-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0385-8146(97)10011-6. View

12.

Orhan I, Aydin S, Ormeci T, Yilmaz F . A radiological analysis of inferior turbinate in patients with deviated nasal septum by using computed tomography. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2014; 28(1):e68-72. DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2014.28.4007. View

13.

Widmann G, Zangerl A, Schullian P, Fasser M, Puelacher W, Bale R . Do image modality and registration method influence the accuracy of craniofacial navigation?. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 70(9):2165-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.08.026. View

14.

Bauer S, Vogt K, Wernecke K, Rasp G, Parker Davidson K, Roesch S . Elastometry - The biomechanical analysis of the lateral nasal wall. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2023; 150:106284. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106284. View

15.

Grimes D, Schulz K . Compared to what? Finding controls for case-control studies. Lancet. 2005; 365(9468):1429-33. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66379-9. View

16.

Giotakis A, Widmann G, Mallien E, Riechelmann F, Heppt H, Riechelmann H . CT analysis of the anterior nasal airway based on the direction of nasal airflow in patients with nasal obstruction and trauma controls. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022; 280(4):1765-1774. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07703-1. View

17.

Janovic N, Janovic A, Milicic B, Djuric M . Is Computed Tomography Imaging of Deviated Nasal Septum Justified for Obstruction Confirmation?. Ear Nose Throat J. 2019; 100(2):NP131-NP136. DOI: 10.1177/0145561319871533. View

18.

Giotakis A, Tomazic P, Riechelmann H, Vent J . Objective Assessment of Nasal Patency. Facial Plast Surg. 2017; 33(4):378-387. DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1604356. View

19.

Chiesa Estomba C, Rivera Schmitz T, Ossa Echeverri C, Betances Reinoso F, Osorio Velasquez A, Santidrian Hidalgo C . Compensatory hypertrophy of the contralateral inferior turbinate in patients with unilateral nasal septal deviation. A computed tomography study. Otolaryngol Pol. 2015; 69(2):14-20. DOI: 10.5604/00306657.1149568. View

20.

Neskey D, Eloy J, Casiano R . Nasal, septal, and turbinate anatomy and embryology. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2009; 42(2):193-205, vii. DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2009.01.008. View