» Articles » PMID: 38524879

Optimal Once-Daily Busulfan Administration in Pediatric Patients: A Simulation-Based Investigation of Intravenous Infusion Times

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2024 Mar 25
PMID 38524879
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Pediatric patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation undergo regular administration of intravenous busulfan as a conditioning regimen. Once-daily regimen of busulfan has been proposed as a more convenient alternative to the traditional regimen, but it may increase the risk of toxicity such as veno-occlusive disease (VOD). The study aims to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of once-daily regimens and investigate appropriate intravenous infusion times to reduce the risk of toxicity.

Patients And Methods: Once-daily busulfan dosing regimens for pediatric patient were reviewed and selected including EMA- and FDA-based once-daily dosing regimens. We generated busulfan PK data of virtual pediatric patients using a previously developed population PK model. PK profiles and proportion of patients achieving the referenced maximum concentration (Cmax) and exposure to busulfan were used to evaluate the appropriateness of both infusion time and dosing regimens.

Results: Predicted PK profiles and exposure of busulfan showed relatively similar distributions for all once-daily dosing regimens. Most patients exceeded the referenced Cmax possibly associated with a high risk of VOD with all once-daily regimens when applied with 3 hours of infusion.

Conclusion: While intravenous infusion of once-daily busulfan is typically administered over 3 hours, our findings emphasize the necessity of considering sufficient infusion times to ensure safe drug utilization and prevent toxicity, which will aid in optimal busulfan use in pediatric oncology.

Citing Articles

Comparison of busulfan pharmacokinetics between four-times-daily and once-daily administration in pediatric patients: a preliminary prospective observational trial.

Yamaguchi A, Hirabayashi S, Niki K, Kagami K, Terashita Y, Cho Y Int J Hematol. 2024; 121(2):244-251.

PMID: 39625679 DOI: 10.1007/s12185-024-03891-0.

References
1.
Bartelink I, Bredius R, Ververs T, Raphael M, van Kesteren C, Bierings M . Once-daily intravenous busulfan with therapeutic drug monitoring compared to conventional oral busulfan improves survival and engraftment in children undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2007; 14(1):88-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2007.09.015. View

2.
Michel G, Valteau-Couanet D, Gentet J, Esperou H, Socie G, Mechinaud F . Weight-based strategy of dose administration in children using intravenous busulfan: clinical and pharmacokinetic results. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011; 58(1):90-7. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.22959. View

3.
Feng X, Wu Y, Zhang J, Li J, Zhu G, Fan D . Busulfan systemic exposure and its relationship with efficacy and safety in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children: a meta-analysis. BMC Pediatr. 2020; 20(1):176. PMC: 7168843. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-020-02028-6. View

4.
Kawazoe A, Funaki T, Kim S . Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Busulfan in Japanese Pediatric and Adult HCT Patients. J Clin Pharmacol. 2018; 58(9):1196-1204. DOI: 10.1002/jcph.1120. View

5.
Buffery P, Allen K, Chin P, Moore G, Barclay M, Begg E . Thirteen years' experience of pharmacokinetic monitoring and dosing of busulfan: can the strategy be improved?. Ther Drug Monit. 2013; 36(1):86-92. DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e31829dc940. View