» Articles » PMID: 38524814

Using Artificial Intelligence for Exercise Prescription in Personalised Health Promotion: A Critical Evaluation of OpenAI's GPT-4 Model

Abstract

The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in healthcare provides new possibilities for personalized health management. AI-based fitness applications are becoming more common, facilitating the opportunity for individualised exercise prescription. However, the use of AI carries the risk of inadequate expert supervision, and the efficacy and validity of such applications have not been thoroughly investigated, particularly in the context of diverse health conditions. The aim of the study was to critically assess the efficacy of exercise prescriptions generated by OpenAI's Generative Pre-Trained Transformer 4 (GPT-4) model for five example patient profiles with diverse health conditions and fitness goals. Our focus was to assess the model's ability to generate exercise prescriptions based on a singular, initial interaction, akin to a typical user experience. The evaluation was conducted by leading experts in the field of exercise prescription. Five distinct scenarios were formulated, each representing a hypothetical individual with a specific health condition and fitness objective. Upon receiving details of each individual, the GPT-4 model was tasked with generating a 30-day exercise program. These AI-derived exercise programs were subsequently subjected to a thorough evaluation by experts in exercise prescription. The evaluation encompassed adherence to established principles of frequency, intensity, time, and exercise type; integration of perceived exertion levels; consideration for medication intake and the respective medical condition; and the extent of program individualization tailored to each hypothetical profile. The AI model could create general safety-conscious exercise programs for various scenarios. However, the AI-generated exercise prescriptions lacked precision in addressing individual health conditions and goals, often prioritizing excessive safety over the effectiveness of training. The AI-based approach aimed to ensure patient improvement through gradual increases in training load and intensity, but the model's potential to fine-tune its recommendations through ongoing interaction was not fully satisfying. AI technologies, in their current state, can serve as supplemental tools in exercise prescription, particularly in enhancing accessibility for individuals unable to access, often costly, professional advice. However, AI technologies are not yet recommended as a substitute for personalized, progressive, and health condition-specific prescriptions provided by healthcare and fitness professionals. Further research is needed to explore more interactive use of AI models and integration of real-time physiological feedback.

Citing Articles

A digital tool for self-reporting cardiovascular risk factors: The RADICAL study.

Ferreira Santos J, Castela I, Gamboa Madeira S, Furtado S, Vieira Pereira H, Teixeira D Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2025; 24:200368.

PMID: 39897346 PMC: 11786916. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2025.200368.


The potential of large language model chatbots for application to epilepsy: Let's talk about physical exercise.

Rocha-Silva R, de Lima B, Jose G, Cordeiro D, Viana R, Andrade M Epilepsy Behav Rep. 2024; 27:100692.

PMID: 39416714 PMC: 11480856. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebr.2024.100692.


Optimizing athletic performance through advanced nutrition strategies: can AI and digital platforms have a role in ultraendurance sports?.

Puce L, Ceylan H, Trompetto C, Cotellessa F, Schenone C, Marinelli L Biol Sport. 2024; 41(4):305-313.

PMID: 39416500 PMC: 11475005. DOI: 10.5114/biolsport.2024.141063.


From tools to threats: a reflection on the impact of artificial-intelligence chatbots on cognitive health.

Dergaa I, Ben Saad H, Glenn J, Amamou B, Ben Aissa M, Guelmami N Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1259845.

PMID: 38629037 PMC: 11020077. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1259845.


Supporting athletes during a challenging situation: recommendations from a global insight of COVID-19 home-based training experience.

Washif J, Hettinga F, Ammar A, van Rensburg D, Materne O, Trabelsi K BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024; 16(1):83.

PMID: 38622683 PMC: 11017558. DOI: 10.1186/s13102-024-00869-7.

References
1.
Chaves L, Domingos A, Louzada Fernandes D, Ribeiro Cerqueira F, Siqueira-Batista R, Bressan J . Applicability of machine learning techniques in food intake assessment: A systematic review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2021; 63(7):902-919. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1956425. View

2.
Taylor J, Holland D, Spathis J, Beetham K, Wisloff U, Keating S . Guidelines for the delivery and monitoring of high intensity interval training in clinical populations. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2019; 62(2):140-146. DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2019.01.004. View

3.
Shei R, Paris H, Wilhite D, Chapman R, Mickleborough T . The role of inspiratory muscle training in the management of asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Phys Sportsmed. 2016; 44(4):327-334. DOI: 10.1080/00913847.2016.1176546. View

4.
McDowell C, Dishman R, Gordon B, Herring M . Physical Activity and Anxiety: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies. Am J Prev Med. 2019; 57(4):545-556. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.05.012. View

5.
KARVONEN M, Kentala E, Mustala O . The effects of training on heart rate; a longitudinal study. Ann Med Exp Biol Fenn. 1957; 35(3):307-15. View