» Articles » PMID: 38524719

Diagnosis and Prevention of Periprosthetic Joint Infections by Staphylococcus Aureus After Hip Fracture: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Overview
Publisher Thieme
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2024 Mar 25
PMID 38524719
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Hip arthroplasties are surgical procedures widely performed all over the world, seeking to return functionality, relieve pain, and improve the quality of life of patients affected by osteoarthritis, femoral neck fractures, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, among other etiologies. Periprosthetic joint infections are one of the most feared complications due to the high associated morbidity and mortality, with a high number of pathogens that may be associated with its etiology. The aim of the present study was to analyze aspects correlated with the occurrence of infection, diagnosis and prevention of periprosthetic joint infections in the hip associated with after corrective surgery for hip fractures. This is a systematic review of the literature carried out in the databases indexed in the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) carried out in accordance with the precepts established by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology. Twenty studies that addressed the diagnosis and prevention of periprosthetic joint infections after hip fractures were selected for analysis. It is observed that there is no consensus in the literature on preventive measures for the occurrence of such infectious processes. Among the risk factors for the occurrence and severity of infections by after hip arthroplasties, obesity, longer surgical time, older age, immunosuppression, recent use of antibiotics, and multicomorbidities were mentioned. The use of biomarkers for early diagnosis, as well as screening, decolonization, and antibiotic prophylaxis processes are among the preventive procedures proposed in the literature.

References
1.
Cunningham D, Kavolus 2nd J, Bolognesi M, Wellman S, Seyler T . Specific Infectious Organisms Associated With Poor Outcomes in Treatment for Hip Periprosthetic Infection. J Arthroplasty. 2017; 32(6):1984-1990.e5. PMC: 5440199. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.027. View

2.
Roth V, Mitchell R, Vachon J, Alexandre S, Amaratunga K, Smith S . Periprosthetic Infection following Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: The Impact of Limiting the Postoperative Surveillance Period. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016; 38(2):147-153. DOI: 10.1017/ice.2016.256. View

3.
McNally M, Sousa R, Wouthuyzen-Bakker M, Chen A, Soriano A, Vogely H . The EBJIS definition of periprosthetic joint infection. Bone Joint J. 2020; 103-B(1):18-25. PMC: 7954183. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B1.BJJ-2020-1381.R1. View

4.
Cimen O, Azboy N, Catal B, Azboy I . Assessment of periprosthetic joint infection prevention methods amongst Turkish orthopedic surgeons in total joint replacement: A survey. Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2020; 31(2):230-237. PMC: 7489147. DOI: 10.5606/ehc.2020.71425. View

5.
Rohrer F, Wendt M, Noetzli H, Risch L, Bodmer T, Cottagnoud P . Preoperative decolonization and periprosthetic joint infections-A randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up. J Orthop Res. 2020; 39(2):333-338. DOI: 10.1002/jor.24916. View