» Articles » PMID: 38522040

Association of National Identity and Trust in Government with COVID-19 Vaccination and Brand Choice in Taiwan

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Public Health
Date 2024 Mar 24
PMID 38522040
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In Taiwan, hesitancy regarding COVID-19 vaccination centered more on the choice of vaccine brand than on the decision to vaccinate. However, there is limited research exploring the factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine brand preferences from a sociopolitical perspective. Thus, we aimed to examine how Taiwanese national identity and trust in government influence vaccination status and vaccine brand choice, using longitudinal data from 2020, 2021, and 2023. This study utilized data from the Taiwan Panel Study of Family Dynamics 2020 survey, and combined it with data from two self-administered surveys conducted in 2021 and 2023. We focused on four vaccines commonly administered in Taiwan: AstraZeneca, Moderna, Pfizer-BioNTech, and the domestically-developed Medigen. Using Poisson regression models with robust standard errors, we assessed the effects of national identity and trust in government on the choice of COVID-19 vaccine brand. By analyzing data from 2361 participants, we found that national identity and trust in government were associated with the likelihood of COVID-19 vaccination, the number of vaccine doses received, and the brand of vaccine taken. Those who identified themselves as Taiwanese were more inclined to receive the Medigen and AstraZeneca vaccines, but less willing to receive Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. Those who trusted the government were more likely to prefer and receive the Medigen vaccine. Conversely, those who didn't trust the government were less likely to prefer Medigen and AstraZeneca vaccines, but were willing to receive Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. Vaccine brand preferences and uptake in Taiwan were affected by individuals' national identity and their trust in government. This highlights the critical role of sociopolitical factors in shaping public health strategies.

References
1.
Steinbrook R . Lessons From the Success of COVID-19 Control in Taiwan. JAMA Intern Med. 2021; 181(7):922. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.1625. View

2.
Summers J, Cheng H, Lin H, Telfar Barnard L, Kvalsvig A, Wilson N . Potential lessons from the Taiwan and New Zealand health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2021; 4:100044. PMC: 7577184. DOI: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2020.100044. View

3.
Wang C, Ng C, Brook R . Response to COVID-19 in Taiwan: Big Data Analytics, New Technology, and Proactive Testing. JAMA. 2020; 323(14):1341-1342. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.3151. View

4.
Yen M, Yen Y, Chen S, Lee T, Huang K, Chan T . Learning from the past: Taiwan's responses to COVID-19 versus SARS. Int J Infect Dis. 2021; 110:469-478. PMC: 8178059. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.06.002. View

5.
Dyer O . Covid-19: Variants are spreading in countries with low vaccination rates. BMJ. 2021; 373:n1359. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n1359. View