» Articles » PMID: 38520596

Is 80% Satisfaction Still the Expectation in Modern TKA Mechanically Aligned with Robot Assist? We Think Not

Overview
Journal J Robot Surg
Publisher Springer
Date 2024 Mar 23
PMID 38520596
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Several studies reported that20% of patients were unhappy with the outcome of their total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Having commenced robot assist TKA whilst maintaining the goal of implanting the prosthesis to a neutral mechanical axis, we reviewed our patients to find out if we also have a 20% rate of patients being unhappy with the outcome of their knee replacement surgery. We hypothesized that rate of patient satisfaction would be higher than 90% with robot-surgical assistant (ROSA) technique. The first 175 patients who underwent ROSA TKA were reviewed at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively. All TKAs were performed using ROSA technique with Persona cementless prosthesis aiming to restore neutral mechanical coronal alignment with flexion gap balancing. We investigated whether or not the patients were happy they had their knee replacement surgery and whether they were happy with the outcome. 165 (94%) of 175 patients, were contactable with 1 deceased and 9 uncontactable. From the 165 patients who participated in the study, 95% of patients were happy they had the surgery done and 93% were happy with the outcome of their knee replacement. A sub analysis showed that patients who had simultaneous bilateral TKA were significantly less likely to be happy than staged procedures (p < 0.05). Total knee replacement utilising robot technique with modern implants and aiming for mechanical coronal alignment of the implants to restore the mechanical axis with flexion gap balancing may result in > 90% of patients being happy with the outcome of their surgery.

Citing Articles

Functional Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty in Severe Varus Deformities of the Knee in the Indian Population.

Chamundaiah J, Gupta N, Mahalingam S, Edwin J Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e72398.

PMID: 39583484 PMC: 11586111. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.72398.


Conventionally instrumented inverse kinematic alignment for total knee arthroplasty: How is it done?.

Russell S, Keyes S, Hirschmann M, Harty J J Exp Orthop. 2024; 11(3):e12055.

PMID: 38868128 PMC: 11167404. DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.12055.

References
1.
Baker P, van der Meulen J, Lewsey J, Gregg P . The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007; 89(7):893-900. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B7.19091. View

2.
Bourne R, Chesworth B, Davis A, Mahomed N, Charron K . Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 468(1):57-63. PMC: 2795819. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1119-9. View

3.
Scott C, Howie C, MacDonald D, Biant L . Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a prospective study of 1217 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010; 92(9):1253-8. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B9.24394. View

4.
Kahlenberg C, Nwachukwu B, McLawhorn A, Cross M, Cornell C, Padgett D . Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review. HSS J. 2018; 14(2):192-201. PMC: 6031540. DOI: 10.1007/s11420-018-9614-8. View

5.
Canfield M, Savoy L, Cote M, Halawi M . Patient-reported outcome measures in total joint arthroplasty: defining the optimal collection window. Arthroplast Today. 2020; 6(1):62-67. PMC: 7083724. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2019.10.003. View