» Articles » PMID: 38516038

Appreciable Biosafety, Biocompatibility and Osteogenic Capability of 3D Printed Nonstoichiometric Wollastonite Scaffolds Favorable for Clinical Translation

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2024 Mar 22
PMID 38516038
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Alveolar bone destruction due to periodontal disease often requires a bone graft substitute to reconstruct the anatomical structures and biological functions of the bone tissue. Despite significant advances in the development of foreign ion-doped nonstoichiometric wollastonite bioceramics (CaSiO, nCSi) for alveolar bone regeneration over the past decade, the in vivo biosafety and osteogenesis of nCSi scaffolds remain uncertain. In this study, we developed a customized porous nCSi scaffold to investigate the in vivo biocompatibility and osteogenic properties of nCSi bioceramics.

Methods: Six percent Mg-doped nCSi bioceramic scaffolds were fabricated by digital light processing (DLP), and the scaffold morphology, pore architecture, compressive strength, in vitro biodegradation, and apatite-forming ability of the bioceramic scaffolds were investigated systematically. Subsequently, an alveolar bone defect rabbit model was used to evaluate the biocompatibility and osteogenic efficacy of the nCSi bioceramics. Animal weight, hematological test, blood biochemical test, wet weight of the main organs, and pathological examination of the main organs were conducted. Micro-CT and histological staining were performed to analyze the osteogenic potential of the personalized bioceramic scaffolds.

Results: The nCSi scaffolds exhibited appreciable initial compressive strength (>30 MPa) and mild mechanical decay over time during in vitro biodissolution. In addition, the scaffolds induced apatite remineralization in SBF. Bioceramic scaffolds have been proven to have good biocompatibility in vivo after implantation into the alveolar bone defect of rabbits. No significant effects on the hematological indices, blood biochemical parameters, organ wet weight, or organ histopathology were detected from 3 to 180 days postoperatively. The porous scaffolds exhibited strong bone regeneration capability in the alveolar bone defect model of rabbits. Micro-CT and histological examination showed effective maintenance of bone morphology in the bioceramic scaffold group; however, depressed bone tissue was observed in the control group.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that personalized nCSi bioceramic scaffolds can be fabricated using the DLP technique. These newly developed strong bioceramic scaffolds exhibit good biocompatibility and osteogenic capability in vivo and have excellent potential as next-generation oral implants.

The Translational Potential Of This Article: Tissue-engineered strategies for alveolar bone repair require a bone graft substitute with appreciable biocompatibility and osteogenic capability. This article provides a systematic investigation of the in vivo biosafety and osteogenic property of nCSi to further development of a silicate-based bioceramics materials for clinical applications.

Citing Articles

AI-driven 3D bioprinting for regenerative medicine: From bench to bedside.

Zhang Z, Zhou X, Fang Y, Xiong Z, Zhang T Bioact Mater. 2024; 45:201-230.

PMID: 39651398 PMC: 11625302. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.11.021.


3D printing materials and 3D printed surgical devices in oral and maxillofacial surgery: design, workflow and effectiveness.

Wang X, Mu M, Yan J, Han B, Ye R, Guo G Regen Biomater. 2024; 11:rbae066.

PMID: 39169972 PMC: 11338467. DOI: 10.1093/rb/rbae066.


Basic research is the foundation and driving force for clinical translation.

Li G J Orthop Translat. 2024; 45:A1-A2.

PMID: 38685968 PMC: 11056315. DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2024.04.001.

References
1.
Liu X, Zhao N, Liang H, Tan B, Huang F, Hu H . Bone tissue engineering scaffolds with HUVECs/hBMSCs cocultured on 3D-printed composite bioactive ceramic scaffolds promoted osteogenesis/angiogenesis. J Orthop Translat. 2022; 37:152-162. PMC: 9640992. DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2022.10.008. View

2.
Canellas J, Ritto F, Figueredo C, Fischer R, de Oliveira G, Thole A . Histomorphometric evaluation of different grafting materials used for alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 49(6):797-810. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.10.007. View

3.
Shirazi F, Mehrali M, Oshkour A, Metselaar H, Kadri N, Abu Osman N . Mechanical and physical properties of calcium silicate/alumina composite for biomedical engineering applications. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013; 30:168-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.10.024. View

4.
Stoffel K, Engler H, Kuster M, Riesen W . Changes in biochemical markers after lower limb fractures. Clin Chem. 2006; 53(1):131-4. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2006.076976. View

5.
Li Y, Li J, Jiang S, Zhong C, Zhao C, Jiao Y . The design of strut/TPMS-based pore geometries in bioceramic scaffolds guiding osteogenesis and angiogenesis in bone regeneration. Mater Today Bio. 2023; 20:100667. PMC: 10238647. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100667. View