» Articles » PMID: 38511002

Combination of Autochthonous Strains and -Cinnamaldehyde in Water Reduces Heidelberg in Turkey Poults

Overview
Journal Front Microbiol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2024 Mar 21
PMID 38511002
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Reducing the colonization of in turkeys is critical to mitigating the risk of its contamination at later stages of production. Given the increased susceptibility of newly hatched poults to colonization, it is crucial to implement interventions that target potential transmission routes, including drinking water. As no individual intervention explored to date is known to eliminate , the United States Department of Agriculture-Food Safety Inspection Service (USDA-FSIS) recommends employing multiple hurdles to achieve a more meaningful reduction and minimize the potential emergence of resistance. Probiotics and plant-derived antimicrobials (PDAs) have demonstrated efficacy as interventions against in poultry. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the use of turkey-derived probiotics (LB; a mixture of UMNPBX2 and UMNPBX19 isolated from turkey ileum) and a PDA, cinnamaldehyde (TC), alone and in combination (CO), against Heidelberg in turkey drinking water and poults. The presence of 5% nutrient broth or cecal contents as contaminants in water resulted in Heidelberg growth. TC eliminated Heidelberg, regardless of the contaminants present. In contrast, the cecal contents led to increased survival of in the CO group. Unlike TC, LB was most effective against . Heidelberg when the nutrient broth was present, suggesting the role of secondary metabolites in its mechanism of action. In the experiments with poults, individual TC and LB supplementation reduced cecal . Heidelberg in challenged poults by 1.2- and 1.7-log colony-forming units (CFU)/g cecal contents, respectively. Their combination yielded an additive effect, reducing . Heidelberg by 2.7 log CFU/g of cecal contents compared to the control ( ≤ 0.05). However, the impact of TC and LB on the translocation of . Heidelberg to the liver was more significant than CO. TC and LB are effective preharvest interventions against . Heidelberg in poultry production. Nonetheless, further investigations are needed to determine the optimum application method and its efficacy in adult turkeys.

References
1.
Dewi G, Nair D, Peichel C, Johnson T, Noll S, Kollanoor Johny A . Effect of lemongrass essential oil against multidrug-resistant Salmonella Heidelberg and its attachment to chicken skin and meat. Poult Sci. 2021; 100(7):101116. PMC: 8182231. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101116. View

2.
Tanikawa T, Shoji N, Sonohara N, Saito S, Shimura Y, Fukushima J . Aging transition of the bacterial community structure in the chick ceca. Poult Sci. 2011; 90(5):1004-8. DOI: 10.3382/ps.2010-01153. View

3.
Kempf F, Menanteau P, Rychlik I, Kubasova T, Trotereau J, Virlogeux-Payant I . Gut microbiota composition before infection determines the Salmonella super- and low-shedder phenotypes in chicken. Microb Biotechnol. 2020; 13(5):1611-1630. PMC: 7415355. DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.13621. View

4.
Dewi G, Manjankattil S, Peichel C, Jia S, Nair D, Vickers Z . Effect of plant-derived antimicrobials against multidrug-resistant Salmonella Heidelberg in ground Turkey. Poult Sci. 2022; 101(3):101581. PMC: 8741611. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101581. View

5.
Riboulet-Bisson E, Sturme M, Jeffery I, ODonnell M, Neville B, Forde B . Effect of Lactobacillus salivarius bacteriocin Abp118 on the mouse and pig intestinal microbiota. PLoS One. 2012; 7(2):e31113. PMC: 3281923. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031113. View