Evaluation of the Usefulness of Insertion-null Markers in Critical Skeletal Remains

Overview

Journal Int J Legal Med

Specialty Forensic Sciences

Date 2024 Mar 21

PMID 38509248

Authors

Christian Haarkotter

Maria Saiz

Xiomara Galvez

Diana C Vinueza-Espinosa

Maria Isabel Medina-Lozano

Juan Carlos Alvarez

Jose Antonio Lorente

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Forensic DNA analysis in compromised skeletal remains may pose challenges due to DNA degradation, often resulting in partial or negative autosomal STRs profiles. To address this issue, alternative approaches such as mitochondrial DNA or SNPs typing may be employed; however, they are labour-intensive and costly. Insertion-null alleles (INNULs), short interspersed nuclear elements, have been suggested as a valuable tool for human identification in challenging samples due to their small amplicon size. A commercial kit including 20 INNULs markers along with amelogenin (InnoTyper® 21) has been developed. This study assesses its utility using degraded skeletal remains, comparing the results obtained (the number of detected alleles, RFU values, PHR, and the number of reportable markers) to those obtained using GlobalFiler™. Subsequently, the random match probability of the two profiles for each sample was determined using Familias version 3 to evaluate the power of discrimination of the results obtained from each kit. In every sample, InnoTyper® 21 yielded more alleles, higher RFU values, and a greater number of reportable loci. However, in most cases, both profiles were similarly informative. In conclusion, InnoTyper® 21 serves as a valuable complement to the analysis of challenging samples in cases where a poor or negative profile was obtained.

References

Berger C, Parson W . Mini-midi-mito: adapting the amplification and sequencing strategy of mtDNA to the degradation state of crime scene samples. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2009; 3(3):149-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2009.01.011. View

Paabo S, Poinar H, Serre D, Jaenicke-Despres V, Hebler J, Rohland N . Genetic analyses from ancient DNA. Annu Rev Genet. 2004; 38:645-79. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.genet.37.110801.143214. View

van den Berge M, Wiskerke D, Gerretsen R, Tabak J, Sijen T . DNA and RNA profiling of excavated human remains with varying postmortem intervals. Int J Legal Med. 2016; 130(6):1471-1480. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-016-1438-9. View

Weber J, David D, Heil J, Fan Y, Zhao C, Marth G . Human diallelic insertion/deletion polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet. 2002; 71(4):854-62. PMC: 378541. DOI: 10.1086/342727. View

Ristow P, Barnes N, Murphy G, Brown H, Cloete K, DAmato M . Evaluation of the InnoTyper 21 genotyping kit in multi-ethnic populations. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017; 30:43-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.06.002. View

Kling D, Tillmar A, Egeland T . Familias 3 - Extensions and new functionality. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014; 13:121-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.07.004. View

Butler J, Shen Y, McCord B . The development of reduced size STR amplicons as tools for analysis of degraded DNA. J Forensic Sci. 2003; 48(5):1054-64. View

Haarkotter C, Galvez X, Vinueza-Espinosa D, Medina-Lozano M, Saiz M, Lorente J . A comparison of five DNA extraction methods from degraded human skeletal remains. Forensic Sci Int. 2023; 348:111730. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111730. View

Saiz M, Gutierrez-Carvajal A, Galvez X, Lorente J, Alvarez J . Population genetic data of 20 insertion-null allele markers in the Andalusian population. Int J Legal Med. 2019; 133(5):1397-1400. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-019-02044-x. View

10.

Moura-Neto R, Mello I, Silva R, Maette A, Bottino C, Woerner A . Evaluation of InnoTyper® 21 in a sample of Rio de Janeiro population as an alternative forensic panel. Int J Legal Med. 2017; 132(1):149-151. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-017-1642-2. View

11.

Amorim A . A cautionary note on the evaluation of genetic evidence from uniparentally transmitted markers. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2008; 2(4):376-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2008.04.001. View

12.

Dabney J, Meyer M, Paabo S . Ancient DNA damage. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013; 5(7). PMC: 3685887. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a012567. View

13.

Brown H, Thompson R, Murphy G, Peters D, La Rue B, King J . Development and validation of a novel multiplexed DNA analysis system, InnoTyper 21. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017; 29:80-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.03.017. View

14.

Martins C, Ferreira P, Carvalho R, Costa S, Farinha C, Azevedo L . Internal validation of two new retrotransposons-based kits (InnoQuant HY and InnoTyper 21) at a forensic lab. Forensic Sci Int. 2017; 283:1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.11.037. View

15.

Martins C, Ferreira P, Carvalho R, Costa S, Farinha C, Azevedo L . Evaluation of InnoQuant HY and InnoTyper 21 kits in the DNA analysis of rootless hair samples. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018; 39:61-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.12.005. View

16.

Cooper A, Poinar H . Ancient DNA: do it right or not at all. Science. 2000; 289(5482):1139. DOI: 10.1126/science.289.5482.1139b. View

17.

LaRue B, Sinha S, Montgomery A, Thompson R, Klaskala L, Ge J . INNULs: A novel design amplification strategy for retrotransposable elements for studying population variation. Hum Hered. 2012; 74(1):27-35. DOI: 10.1159/000343050. View

18.

Green R, Briggs A, Krause J, Prufer K, Burbano H, Siebauer M . The Neandertal genome and ancient DNA authenticity. EMBO J. 2009; 28(17):2494-502. PMC: 2725275. DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2009.222. View

19.

Kim G, Kwon S, Lee S, Min Seong K, Kim J, Lim S . Evaluation of the InnoTyper21® system for the applications into trace and degraded DNA in the Korean population. Int J Legal Med. 2020; 134(6):2053-2059. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-020-02429-3. View

20.

Burger J, Hummel S, Hermann B, Henke W . DNA preservation: a microsatellite-DNA study on ancient skeletal remains. Electrophoresis. 1999; 20(8):1722-8. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19990101)20:8<1722::AID-ELPS1722>3.0.CO;2-4. View