» Articles » PMID: 38509135

Visualizing Threat and Trustworthiness Prior Beliefs in Face Perception in High Versus Low Paranoia

Overview
Date 2024 Mar 21
PMID 38509135
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Predictive processing accounts of psychosis conceptualize delusions as overly strong learned expectations (prior beliefs) that shape cognition and perception. Paranoia, the most prevalent form of delusions, involves threat prior beliefs that are inherently social. Here, we investigated whether paranoia is related to overly strong threat prior beliefs in face perception. Participants with subclinical levels of high (n = 109) versus low (n = 111) paranoia viewed face stimuli paired with written descriptions of threatening versus trustworthy behaviors, thereby activating their threat versus trustworthiness prior beliefs. Subsequently, they completed an established social-psychological reverse correlation image classification (RCIC) paradigm. This paradigm used participants' responses to randomly varying face stimuli to generate individual classification images (ICIs) that intend to visualize either facial prior belief (threat vs. trust). An independent sample (n = 76) rated these ICIs as more threatening in the threat compared to the trust condition, validating the causal effect of prior beliefs on face perception. Contrary to expectations derived from predictive processing accounts, there was no evidence for a main effect of paranoia. This finding suggests that paranoia was not related to stronger threat prior beliefs that directly affected face perception, challenging the assumption that paranoid beliefs operate on a perceptual level.

Citing Articles

Differential neural activity predicts the long-term stability of the effects of positive and negative expectations on pain.

Wolf M, Wittkamp C, Rose M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):27874.

PMID: 39537677 PMC: 11561249. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-77693-z.

References
1.
Todorov A, Olivola C, Dotsch R, Mende-Siedlecki P . Social attributions from faces: determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. Annu Rev Psychol. 2014; 66:519-45. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143831. View

2.
Fowler D, Freeman D, Smith B, Kuipers E, Bebbington P, Bashforth H . The Brief Core Schema Scales (BCSS): psychometric properties and associations with paranoia and grandiosity in non-clinical and psychosis samples. Psychol Med. 2006; 36(6):749-59. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291706007355. View

3.
Salge J, Pollmann S, Reeder R . Anomalous visual experience is linked to perceptual uncertainty and visual imagery vividness. Psychol Res. 2020; 85(5):1848-1865. PMC: 8289756. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-020-01364-7. View

4.
Pinkham A, Brensinger C, Kohler C, Gur R, Gur R . Actively paranoid patients with schizophrenia over attribute anger to neutral faces. Schizophr Res. 2010; 125(2-3):174-8. PMC: 3031724. DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.11.006. View

5.
Haut K, MacDonald 3rd A . Persecutory delusions and the perception of trustworthiness in unfamiliar faces in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 2010; 178(3):456-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.04.015. View