» Articles » PMID: 38507746

Cytoreductive Therapy in Younger Adults with Polycythemia Vera: a Meta-analysis of Safety and Outcomes

Overview
Journal Blood Adv
Specialty Hematology
Date 2024 Mar 20
PMID 38507746
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cytoreductive therapy is not routinely recommended for younger patients with polycythemia vera (PV) due to concern that treatment toxicity may outweigh therapeutic benefits. However, no systematic data support this approach. To support objective risk/benefit assessment of cytoreductive drugs in patients with PV aged <60 years (PV<60), this systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate toxicity and disease-related complications in PV<60 treated with interferon alfa (rIFN-α) or hydroxyurea (HU). A search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Embase identified 693 unique studies with relevant keywords, of which 14 met inclusion criteria and were selected for analysis. The weighted average age of patients treated with rIFN-α was 48 years (n = 744 patients; 12 studies) and for HU was 56 years (n = 1397; 8 studies). The weighted average duration of treatment for either drug was 4.5 years. Using a Bayesian hierarchical model, the pooled annual rate of discontinuation due to toxicity was 5.2% for patients receiving rIFN-α (n = 587; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2-8.2) and 3.6% for HU (n = 1097; CI, 1-6.2). The average complete hematologic response for rIFN-α and HU was 62% and 52%, respectively. Patients experienced thrombotic events at a pooled annual rate of 0.79% and 1.26%; secondary myelofibrosis at 1.06% and 1.62%; acute myeloid leukemia at 0.14% and 0.26%; and death at 0.87% and 2.65%, respectively. No treatment-related deaths were reported. With acceptable rates of nonfatal toxicity, cytoreductive treatment, particularly with disease-modifying rIFN-α, may benefit PV<60. Future randomized trials prioritizing inclusion of PV<60 are needed to establish a long-term benefit of early cytoreductive treatment in these patients.

Citing Articles

Spatial-transcriptomic profiling: a new lens for understanding myelofibrosis pathophysiology.

Peroni E, Calistri E, Amato R, Gottardi M, Rosato A Cell Commun Signal. 2024; 22(1):510.

PMID: 39434124 PMC: 11492555. DOI: 10.1186/s12964-024-01877-3.


Are we ready for disease modification in myeloproliferative neoplasms?.

Harrison C Hemasphere. 2024; 8(9):e70003.

PMID: 39411457 PMC: 11476717. DOI: 10.1002/hem3.70003.

References
1.
Bewersdorf J, Giri S, Wang R, Podoltsev N, Williams R, Tallman M . Interferon alpha therapy in essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Leukemia. 2020; 35(6):1643-1660. PMC: 7917159. DOI: 10.1038/s41375-020-01020-4. View

2.
Cerquozzi S, Tefferi A . Blast transformation and fibrotic progression in polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia: a literature review of incidence and risk factors. Blood Cancer J. 2015; 5:e366. PMC: 4670948. DOI: 10.1038/bcj.2015.95. View

3.
Pemmaraju N, Gerds A, Yu J, Parasuraman S, Shah A, Xi A . Thrombotic events and mortality risk in patients with newly diagnosed polycythemia vera or essential thrombocythemia. Leuk Res. 2022; 115:106809. DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2022.106809. View

4.
Zhang Z, Duan Y . Interferon apha 2b for treating patients with JAK2V617F positive polycythemia vera and essential thrombocytosis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014; 15(4):1681-4. DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.4.1681. View

5.
Silver R, Abu-Zeinah G . Polycythemia vera: aspects of its current diagnosis and initial treatment. Expert Rev Hematol. 2023; 16(4):253-266. DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2023.2198698. View