» Articles » PMID: 38507693

Fluorescence Microscopy with Deep UV, Near UV, and Visible Excitation for Detection of Microorganisms

Overview
Journal Astrobiology
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 Mar 20
PMID 38507693
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We report a simple, inexpensive design of a fluorescence microscope with light-emitting diode (LED) excitation for detection of labeled and unlabeled microorganisms in mineral substrates. The use of deep UV (DUV) excitation with visible emission requires no specialized optics or slides and can be implemented easily and inexpensively using an oblique illumination geometry. DUV excitation (<280 nm) is preferable to near UV (365 nm) for avoidance of mineral autofluorescence. When excited with DUV, unpigmented bacteria show two emission peaks: one in the near UV ∼320 nm, corresponding to proteins, and another peak in the blue to green range, corresponding to flavins and/or reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH). Many commonly used dyes also show secondary excitation peaks in the DUV, with identical emission spectra and quantum yields as their primary peak. However, DUV fails to excite key biosignature molecules, especially chlorophyll in cyanobacteria. Visible excitation (violet to blue) also results in less mineral autofluorescence than near UV, and most autofluorescence in the minerals seen here is green, so that red dyes and red autofluorescence of chlorophyll and porphyrins are readily distinguished. The pairing of DUV and near UV or visible excitation, with emission across the visible, represents the most thorough approach to detection of labeled and unlabeled bacteria in soil and rock.

Citing Articles

Imaging of porphyrin-specific fluorescence in pathogenic bacteria using a wearable, hands-free system.

Sun J, Vellappan S, Akdemir J, Steier L, Feinbloom R, Yadavalli S bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39553962 PMC: 11565998. DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.20.595019.

References
1.
Rennie M, Dunham D, Lindvere-Teene L, Raizman R, Hill R, Linden R . Understanding Real-Time Fluorescence Signals from Bacteria and Wound Tissues Observed with the MolecuLight i:X. Diagnostics (Basel). 2019; 9(1). PMC: 6468690. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics9010022. View

2.
Yang L, Zhou Y, Zhu S, Huang T, Wu L, Yan X . Detection and quantification of bacterial autofluorescence at the single-cell level by a laboratory-built high-sensitivity flow cytometer. Anal Chem. 2012; 84(3):1526-32. DOI: 10.1021/ac2031332. View

3.
Kepner Jr R, Pratt J . Use of fluorochromes for direct enumeration of total bacteria in environmental samples: past and present. Microbiol Rev. 1994; 58(4):603-15. PMC: 372983. DOI: 10.1128/mr.58.4.603-615.1994. View

4.
Seo E, Ahn T, Zo Y . Agreement, precision, and accuracy of epifluorescence microscopy methods for enumeration of total bacterial numbers. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010; 76(6):1981-91. PMC: 2837990. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01724-09. View

5.
Chan M, Hinman N, Potter-McIntyre S, Schubert K, Gillams R, Awramik S . Deciphering Biosignatures in Planetary Contexts. Astrobiology. 2019; 19(9):1075-1102. PMC: 6708275. DOI: 10.1089/ast.2018.1903. View