» Articles » PMID: 38507617

The Impact of Monetary Incentives on Delay Discounting Within a Year-Long Physical Activity Intervention

Overview
Journal Ann Behav Med
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2024 Mar 20
PMID 38507617
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Delay discounting is the depreciation in a reward's perceived value as a function of the time until receipt. Monetary incentive programs that provide rewards contingent on meeting daily physical activity (PA) goals may change participants' delay discounting preferences.

Purpose: Determine if monetary incentives provided in close temporal proximity to meeting PA goals changed delay discounting, and if such changes mediated intervention effects.

Methods: Inactive adults (n = 512) wore accelerometers during a 12-month intervention where they received proximal monetary incentives for meeting daily moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) goals or delayed incentives for study participation. Delay discount rate and average MVPA were assessed at baseline, end of intervention, and a 24-month follow-up. Using structural equation modeling, we tested effects of proximal versus delayed rewards on delay discounting and whether any changes mediated intervention effects on MVPA. PA self-efficacy was also evaluated as a potential mediator, and both self-efficacy and delay discounting were assessed as potential moderators of intervention effects.

Results: Proximal rewards significantly increased participants' delay discounting (β = 0.238, confidence interval [CI]: -0.078, 0.380), indicating greater sensitivity to reinforcement timing. This change did not mediate incentive-associated increases in MVPA at the end of the 12-month intervention (β = -0.016, CI: -0.053, 0.019) or at a 24-month follow-up (β = -0.020, CI: -0.059, 0.018). Moderation effects were not found.

Conclusions: Incentive-induced increases in delay discounting did not deleteriously impact MVPA. This finding may help assuage concerns about using monetary incentives for PA promotion, but further research regarding the consequences of changes in delay discounting is warranted.

References
1.
Stanger C, Budney A, Bickel W . A developmental perspective on neuroeconomic mechanisms of contingency management. Psychol Addict Behav. 2012; 27(2):403-15. PMC: 3443497. DOI: 10.1037/a0028748. View

2.
Troiano R, Berrigan D, Dodd K, Masse L, Tilert T, McDowell M . Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007; 40(1):181-8. DOI: 10.1249/mss.0b013e31815a51b3. View

3.
Mitchell M, Orstad S, Biswas A, Oh P, Jay M, Pakosh M . Financial incentives for physical activity in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2019; 54(21):1259-1268. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-100633. View

4.
Albelwi T, Rogers R, Kubis H . Exercise as a reward: Self-paced exercise perception and delay discounting in comparison with food and money. Physiol Behav. 2018; 199:333-342. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.12.004. View

5.
Kaplan B, Amlung M, Reed D, Jarmolowicz D, McKerchar T, Lemley S . Automating Scoring of Delay Discounting for the 21- and 27-Item Monetary Choice Questionnaires. Behav Anal. 2020; 39(2):293-304. PMC: 6701266. DOI: 10.1007/s40614-016-0070-9. View