» Articles » PMID: 38505816

Microfluidic Techniques for Mechanical Measurements of Biological Samples

Overview
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2024 Mar 20
PMID 38505816
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The use of microfluidics to make mechanical property measurements is increasingly common. Fabrication of microfluidic devices has enabled various types of flow control and sensor integration at micrometer length scales to interrogate biological materials. For rheological measurements of biofluids, the small length scales are well suited to reach high rates, and measurements can be made on droplet-sized samples. The control of flow fields, constrictions, and external fields can be used in microfluidics to make mechanical measurements of individual bioparticle properties, often at high sampling rates for high-throughput measurements. Microfluidics also enables the measurement of bio-surfaces, such as the elasticity and permeability properties of layers of cells cultured in microfluidic devices. Recent progress on these topics is reviewed, and future directions are discussed.

Citing Articles

Noninvasive characterization of oocyte deformability in microconstrictions.

Barbier L, Bulteau R, Rezaei B, Panier T, Letort G, Labrune E Sci Adv. 2025; 11(8):eadr9869.

PMID: 39970229 PMC: 11838009. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adr9869.


Design of 3D printed chip to improve sensitivity of platelet adhesion through reinjection: Effect of alcohol consumption on platelet adhesion.

Kim H, Park H, Song J, Yeom E Biomicrofluidics. 2025; 19(1):014101.

PMID: 39759388 PMC: 11699976. DOI: 10.1063/5.0237452.


Non-invasive measurement of wall shear stress in microfluidic chip for osteoblast cell culture using improved depth estimation of defocus particle tracking method.

Aung H, Pothipan P, Aswakool J, Santironnarong S, Phatthanakun R, Pinrod V Biomicrofluidics. 2024; 18(5):054114.

PMID: 39464242 PMC: 11510738. DOI: 10.1063/5.0226294.


Comparing the Mechanical Properties of Rice Cells and Protoplasts under PEG6000 Drought Stress Using Double Resonator Piezoelectric Cytometry.

Yan Y, Zhou T, Zhang Y, Kong Z, Pan W, Tan C Biosensors (Basel). 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38920607 PMC: 11201550. DOI: 10.3390/bios14060303.


A review of acoustofluidic separation of bioparticles.

Hossein F, Angeli P Biophys Rev. 2024; 15(6):2005-2025.

PMID: 38192342 PMC: 10771489. DOI: 10.1007/s12551-023-01112-2.


References
1.
Roche A, Gentiluomo L, Sibanda N, Roessner D, Friess W, Trainoff S . Towards an improved prediction of concentrated antibody solution viscosity using the Huggins coefficient. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2021; 607(Pt 2):1813-1824. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.08.191. View

2.
Du E, Dao M, Suresh S . Quantitative Biomechanics of Healthy and Diseased Human Red Blood Cells using Dielectrophoresis in a Microfluidic System. Extreme Mech Lett. 2015; 1:35-41. PMC: 4445737. DOI: 10.1016/j.eml.2014.11.006. View

3.
Wehrman M, Milstrey M, Lindberg S, Schultz K . Using μrheology to quantify rheological properties during repeated reversible phase transitions of soft matter. Lab Chip. 2017; 17(12):2085-2094. DOI: 10.1039/c7lc00222j. View

4.
Chen D, Zhang Z, Ma J, Wang W . ZnO Film Bulk Acoustic Resonator for the Kinetics Study of Human Blood Coagulation. Sensors (Basel). 2017; 17(5). PMC: 5469538. DOI: 10.3390/s17051015. View

5.
Kang Y . Periodic and simultaneous quantification of blood viscosity and red blood cell aggregation using a microfluidic platform under closed-loop circulation. Biomicrofluidics. 2018; 12(2):024116. PMC: 5891346. DOI: 10.1063/1.5017052. View