» Articles » PMID: 38504890

Effect of Extracellular Polymeric Substances on the Colony Size and Morphological Changes of

Overview
Journal Front Plant Sci
Date 2024 Mar 20
PMID 38504890
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Surface blooms of colony-forming are increasingly occurring in aquatic ecosystems on a global scale. Recent studies have found that the colonial morphology is a crucial factor in the occurrence, persistence, and dominance of blooms, yet the mechanism driving its morphological dynamics has remained unknown. This study conducted a laboratory experiment to test the effect of extracellular polymeric substances on the morphological dynamics of . Ultrasound was used to disaggregate colonies, isolating the cells and of the s suspension. The single cells were then re-cultured under three homologous EPS concentrations: group CK, group Low, and group High. The size, morphology, and EPS [including tightly bound EPS (TB-EPS), loosely bound EPS (LB-EPS), bound polysaccharides (B-polysaccharides), and bound proteins (B-proteins)] changes of colonies were closely monitored over a period of 2 months. It was observed that colonies were rapidly formed in group CK, with median colony size () reaching 183 µm on day 12. The proportion of colonies with a size of 150-500 µm increased from 1% to more than 50%. Colony formation was also observed in both groups Low and High, but their increased at a slower rate and remained around 130 µm after day 17. Colonies with a size of 50-150 µm account for more than 50%. Groups CK and Low successively recovered the initial morphology, which is a ring structure formed of several small colonies with a of 130 µm. During the recovery of the colony morphology, the EPS per cell increased and then decreased, with TB-EPS and B-polysaccharides constituting the primary components. The results suggest that colony formation transitioned from adhesion driven to being division driven over time. It is suggested that the homologous EPS released into the ambient environment due to the disaggregation of the colony is a chemical cue that can affect the formation of a colony. This plays an important but largely ignored role in the dynamics of and surface blooms.

References
1.
Le V, Srivastava A, Ko S, Ahn C, Oh H . Microcystis colony formation: Extracellular polymeric substance, associated microorganisms, and its application. Bioresour Technol. 2022; 360:127610. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127610. View

2.
Wu X, Joyce E, Mason T . Evaluation of the mechanisms of the effect of ultrasound on Microcystis aeruginosa at different ultrasonic frequencies. Water Res. 2012; 46(9):2851-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.02.019. View

3.
Otsuka S, Suda S, Li R, Matsumoto S, Watanabe M . Morphological variability of colonies of Microcystis morphospecies in culture. J Gen Appl Microbiol. 2002; 46(1):39-50. DOI: 10.2323/jgam.46.39. View

4.
Stal L . Gregarious cyanobacteria. Environ Microbiol. 2017; 19(6):2105-2109. DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.13739. View

5.
Xu G, Zhang Y, Yang T, Wu H, Lorke A, Pan M . Effect of light-mediated variations of colony morphology on the buoyancy regulation of Microcystis colonies. Water Res. 2023; 235:119839. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2023.119839. View