» Articles » PMID: 38504435

Bilateral Low-Flow Type-D Dural Carotid-Cavernous Fistula: Diagnosis and Treatment with 3D Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography

Overview
Journal Am J Case Rep
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Mar 20
PMID 38504435
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

BACKGROUND Carotid-cavernous fistula (CCF) is a rare, atypical vascular shunt between the carotid arterial system and the venous channels of the cavernous sinus, classified according to the shunt's anatomy, by etiology (resulting from trauma or occurring spontaneously), or by hemodynamic characteristics (such as low- or high-flow fistulas). CASE REPORT A 62-year-old female patient with poorly controlled arterial hypertension presented with bilateral periorbital edema, conjunctival chemosis, ophthalmoplegia, diplopia, and diminished visual acuity. On magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), abnormal arterial flow along the cavernous sinuses was noted, suggestive of bilateral CCF. The diagnosis of indirect dural low-flow CCF (Barrow Type D) was later confirmed by digital subtraction angiography, with feeding arteries from intracavernous internal carotid artery branches, and meningeal branches of the external carotid artery, draining bilaterally to ophthalmic veins, the intracavernous sinus, and the inferior petrosal sinus. The patient was successfully treated with endovascular embolization. At 7-month follow-up, no residual arteriovenous shunting was detected. This case highlights the importance of non-invasive radiological methods for CCF, and presents rarely published radiological findings of bilateral Type-D dural CCFs on 3-dimensional time-of-flight MRA with post-treatment MRA follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Regardless of the patient's history of possible trauma, a patient presenting with bilateral periorbital edema, conjunctival chemosis, ophthalmoplegia, diplopia, and diminished visual acuity should have a spontaneous bilateral CCF investigated to prevent delayed treatment. Experienced neuroradiologists are needed to accurately detect indirect CCF, since this condition often does not demonstrate classic symptoms.

References
1.
Kim D, Choi Y, Song Y, Chung S, Baek J, Lee J . Thin-Section MR Imaging for Carotid Cavernous Fistula. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020; 41(9):1599-1605. PMC: 7583100. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6757. View

2.
Kato H, Ootani N, Abiru K, Okahara M . Investigating Signal Loss due to a Carotid Artery Stent in 3D-TOF-MRA. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2020; 20(3):303-311. PMC: 8424025. DOI: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2019-0083. View

3.
Debrun G, Vinuela F, Fox A, Davis K, Ahn H . Indications for treatment and classification of 132 carotid-cavernous fistulas. Neurosurgery. 1988; 22(2):285-9. DOI: 10.1227/00006123-198802000-00001. View

4.
Willinek W, Born M, Simon B, Tschampa H, Krautmacher C, Gieseke J . Time-of-flight MR angiography: comparison of 3.0-T imaging and 1.5-T imaging--initial experience. Radiology. 2003; 229(3):913-20. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2293020782. View

5.
Hu Y, Guo W, Lin C, Wu H, Luo C, Wu C . Magnetic resonance imaging as a single diagnostic tool for verifying radiosurgery outcomes of cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistula. Eur J Radiol. 2020; 125:108866. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108866. View