The Processing of Spatial Frequencies Through Time in Visual Word Recognition

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Specialty Science

Date 2024 Mar 20

PMID 38503810

Authors

Clemence Bertrand Pilon

Martin Arguin

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

This study examined the temporal profile of spatial frequency processing in a word reading task in 16 normal adult readers. They had to report the word presented in a 200 ms display using a four-alternative forced-choice task (4AFC). The stimuli were made of an additive combination of the signal (i.e. the target word) and of a visual white noise patch wherein the signal-to-noise ratio varied randomly across stimulus duration. Four spatial frequency conditions were defined for the signal component of the stimulus (bandpass Butterworth filters with center frequencies of 1.2, 2.4, 4.8 and 9.6 cycles per degree). In contrast to the coarse-to-fine theory of visual recognition, the results show that the highest spatial frequency range dominates early processing, with a shift toward lower spatial frequencies at later points during stimulus exposure. This pattern interacted in a complex way with the temporal frequency content of signal-to-noise oscillations. The outcome of individual data patterns classification by a machine learning algorithm according to the corresponding spatial frequency band further shows that the most salient spatial frequency signature is obtained when the time dimension within data patterns is recoded into its Fourier transform.

Citing Articles

The oscillatory features of visual processing are altered in healthy aging.

Levesque M, Arguin M Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1323493.

PMID: 38449765 PMC: 10914935. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1323493.

References

Garner W, HAKE H, Eriksen C . Operationism and the concept of perception. Psychol Rev. 1956; 63(3):149-59. DOI: 10.1037/h0042992. View

Levesque M, Arguin M . The oscillatory features of visual processing are altered in healthy aging. Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1323493. PMC: 10914935. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1323493. View

Loftus G, Harley E . How different spatial-frequency components contribute to visual information acquisition. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004; 30(1):104-18. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.1.104. View

Kauffmann L, Chauvin A, Guyader N, Peyrin C . Rapid scene categorization: role of spatial frequency order, accumulation mode and luminance contrast. Vision Res. 2014; 107:49-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.11.013. View

Wiesmann S, Caplette L, Willenbockel V, Gosselin F, Vo M . Flexible time course of spatial frequency use during scene categorization. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):14079. PMC: 8263560. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93252-2. View

Chung S, Legge G, Tjan B . Spatial-frequency characteristics of letter identification in central and peripheral vision. Vision Res. 2002; 42(18):2137-152. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00092-5. View

Parish D, Sperling G . Object spatial frequencies, retinal spatial frequencies, noise, and the efficiency of letter discrimination. Vision Res. 1991; 31(7-8):1399-415. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(91)90060-i. View

Morrison D, Schyns P . Usage of spatial scales for the categorization of faces, objects, and scenes. Psychon Bull Rev. 2001; 8(3):454-69. DOI: 10.3758/bf03196180. View

Legge G, Pelli D, Rubin G, Schleske M . Psychophysics of reading--I. Normal vision. Vision Res. 1985; 25(2):239-52. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(85)90117-8. View

10.

Arguin M, Ferrandez R, Masse J . Oscillatory visual mechanisms revealed by random temporal sampling. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):21309. PMC: 8556381. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-00685-w. View

11.

Brainard D . The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat Vis. 1997; 10(4):433-6. View

12.

Chauvin A, Worsley K, Schyns P, Arguin M, Gosselin F . Accurate statistical tests for smooth classification images. J Vis. 2005; 5(9):659-67. DOI: 10.1167/5.9.1. View

13.

Majaj N, Pelli D, Kurshan P, Palomares M . The role of spatial frequency channels in letter identification. Vision Res. 2002; 42(9):1165-84. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00045-7. View

14.

Peyrin C, Schwartz S, Seghier M, Michel C, Landis T, Vuilleumier P . Hemispheric specialization of human inferior temporal cortex during coarse-to-fine and fine-to-coarse analysis of natural visual scenes. Neuroimage. 2005; 28(2):464-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.006. View

15.

Caplette L, Wicker B, Gosselin F . Atypical Time Course of Object Recognition in Autism Spectrum Disorder. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:35494. PMC: 5067503. DOI: 10.1038/srep35494. View

16.

Fiset D, Blais C, Ethier-Majcher C, Arguin M, Bub D, Gosselin F . Features for identification of uppercase and lowercase letters. Psychol Sci. 2008; 19(11):1161-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02218.x. View

17.

Pelli D, Farell B, Moore D . The remarkable inefficiency of word recognition. Nature. 2003; 423(6941):752-6. DOI: 10.1038/nature01516. View

18.

Caplette L, Gosselin F, West G . Object expectations alter information use during visual recognition. Cognition. 2021; 214:104803. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104803. View

19.

Wang S, Eccleston C, Keogh E . The role of spatial frequency information in the decoding of facial expressions of pain: a novel hybrid task. Pain. 2017; 158(11):2233-2242. DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001031. View

20.

Patching G, Jordan T . Assessing the role of different spatial frequencies in word perception by good and poor readers. Mem Cognit. 2006; 33(6):961-71. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193205. View