» Articles » PMID: 38499735

Development of Clinical Algorithm Utilizing Vibration-Controlled Transient Elastography to Detect Advanced Hepatic Fibrosis in Liver Transplant Recipients

Overview
Journal Dig Dis Sci
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2024 Mar 19
PMID 38499735
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) based liver stiffness measurement (LSM) is an excellent 'rule-out' test for advanced hepatic fibrosis in liver transplant (LT) recipients, however, its ability to 'rule-in' the disease is suboptimal. The study aimed to improve diagnostic performance of LSM in LT recipients.

Methods: Adult LT recipients with a liver biopsy and VCTE were included (N = 150). Sequential covering analysis was performed to create rules to identify patients at low or high risk for advanced fibrosis (stage 3-4).

Results: Advanced hepatic fibrosis was excluded in patients with either LSM < 7.45 kPa (n = 72) or 7.45 ≤ LSM < 12.1 kPa and time from LT < 5.6 years (n = 25). Conversely, likelihood of advanced fibrosis was 95% if patients had LSM > 14.1 and controlled attenuation parameter > 279 dB/m (n = 21). Thus, 118 (79%) were correctly identified and 32 (21%) would have required a biopsy to establish the diagnosis. Compared to previously established LSM based cutoff values of 10.5 kPa (Youden index) and 13.3 kPa (maximized specificity), the false positive rates of sequential covering analysis was 1% compared to 16.5% with LSM ≥ 10.5 kPa and 8.3% with LSM ≥ 13.3 kPa. The true positive rates were comparable at 87% for sequential covering analysis, 93% for LSM ≥ 10.5 kPa and 83% for LSM ≥ 13.3 kPa.

Conclusion: The proposed clinical sequential covering analysis allows for better risk stratification when evaluating for advanced fibrosis in LT recipients compared to LSM alone. Additional efforts are necessary to further reduce the number of patients with indeterminate results in whom a liver biopsy may be required.

References
1.
Burra P, Senzolo M, Adam R, Delvart V, Karam V, Germani G . Liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease in Europe: a study from the ELTR (European Liver Transplant Registry). Am J Transplant. 2009; 10(1):138-48. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02869.x. View

2.
Rinella M, Satapathy S, Brandman D, Smith C, Elwir S, Xia J . Factors Impacting Survival in Those Transplanted for NASH Cirrhosis: Data From the NailNASH Consortium. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022; 21(2):445-455.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.02.028. View

3.
Siddiqui M, Carbone S, Vincent R, Patel S, Driscoll C, Celi F . Prevalence and Severity of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Among Caregivers of Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018; 17(10):2132-2133. PMC: 7018437. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.11.008. View

4.
Siddiqui M, Yamada G, Vuppalanchi R, Van Natta M, Loomba R, Guy C . Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive Fibrosis Models to Detect Change in Fibrosis Stage. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 17(9):1877-1885.e5. PMC: 6609497. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.12.031. View

5.
Chan K, Ng C, Fu C, Quek J, Kong G, Goh Y . The Spectrum and Impact of Metabolic Dysfunction in MAFLD: A Longitudinal Cohort Analysis of 32,683 Overweight and Obese Individuals. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022; 21(10):2560-2569.e15. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.09.028. View